Withdrawal of anticancer therapy in advanced disease: a systematic literature review

被引:51
作者
Clarke, G. [1 ]
Johnston, S. [2 ]
Corrie, P. [3 ]
Kuhn, I. [4 ]
Barclay, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Primary Care Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Canc Res UK Cambridge Res Inst, Cambridge Res Inst, Carroll Lab, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Med Lib, Cambridge, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Molecular targeted agents; Treatment decision-making; End of life; Palliative care; END-OF-LIFE; LUNG-CANCER PATIENTS; PALLIATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; DECISION-MAKING; CARE; PREFERENCES; RECHALLENGE; AGGRESSIVENESS; PROGRESSION; ONCOLOGISTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-015-1862-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Current guidelines set out when to start anticancer treatments, but not when to stop as the end of life approaches. Conventional cytotoxic agents are administered intravenously and have major life-threatening toxicities. Newer drugs include molecular targeted agents (MTAs), in particular, small molecule kinase-inhibitors (KIs), which are administered orally. These have fewer life-threatening toxicities, and are increasingly used to palliate advanced cancer, generally offering additional months of survival benefit. MTAs are substantially more expensive, between 2-8 pound K per month, and perceived as easier to start than stop. Methods: A systematic review of decision-making concerning the withdrawal of anticancer drugs towards the end of life within clinical practice, with a particular focus on MTAs. Nine electronic databases searched. PRISMA guidelines followed. Results: Forty-two studies included. How are decisions made? Decision-making was shared and ongoing, including stopping, starting and trying different treatments. Oncologists often experienced 'professional role dissonance' between their self-perception as 'treaters', and talking about end of life care. Why are decisions made? Clinical factors: disease progression, worsening functional status, treatment side-effects. Non-clinical factors: physicians' personal experience, values, emotions. Some patients continued treatment to maintain 'hope', often reflecting limited understanding of palliative goals. When are decisions made? Limited evidence reveals patients' decisions based upon quality of life benefits. Clinicians found timing withdrawal particularly challenging. Who makes the decisions? Decisions were based within physician-patient interaction. Conclusions: Oncologists report that decisions around stopping chemotherapy treatment are challenging, with limited evidence-based guidance outside of clinical trial protocols. The increasing availability of oral MTAs is transforming the management of incurable cancer; blurring boundaries between active treatment and palliative care. No studies specifically addressing decision-making around stopping MTAs in clinical practice were identified. There is a need to develop an evidence base to support physicians and patients with decision-making around the withdrawal of these high cost treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Sunitinib malate for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Adams, Val R.
    Leggas, Markos
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 29 (07) : 1338 - 1353
  • [2] Chemotherapy use at the end of life. A retrospective single centre experience analysis
    Andreis, Federica
    Rizzi, Anna
    Rota, Luigina
    Meriggi, Fausto
    Mazzocchi, Maria
    Zaniboni, Alberto
    [J]. TUMORI, 2011, 97 (01) : 30 - 34
  • [3] Andrew Jane, 2004, Int J Palliat Nurs, V10, P110
  • [4] [Anonymous], BRIT NAT FORM BNF 67
  • [5] [Anonymous], LONDON NATL CONFIDEN
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2002, NAT CANC CONTR PROGR
  • [7] [Anonymous], FACTORS INFLUENCING
  • [8] [Anonymous], EUR J PALL CAR
  • [9] [Anonymous], CHEM SID EFF
  • [10] Role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy
    Arora, A
    Scholar, EM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 315 (03) : 971 - 979