Inequalities in public health care delivery in Zambia

被引:27
作者
Phiri, Jane [1 ]
Ataguba, John E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town Observ, Sch Publ Hlth & Family Med, Hlth Econ Unit, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
Health inequality; Health inequity; Public health care; Zambia; SOUTH-AFRICA; HORIZONTAL EQUITY; BENEFITS; SERVICES; PRINCIPLES;
D O I
10.1186/1475-9276-13-24
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Access to adequate health services that is of acceptable quality is important in the move towards universal health coverage. However, previous studies have revealed inequities in health care utilisation in the favour of the rich. Further, those with the greatest need for health services are not getting a fair share. In Zambia, though equity in access is extolled in government documents, there is evidence suggesting that those needing health services are not receiving their fair share. This study seeks therefore, to assess if socioeconomic related inequalities/inequities in public health service utilisation in Zambia still persist. Methods: The 2010 nationally representative Zambia Living Conditions and Monitoring Survey data are used. Inequality is assessed using concentration curves and concentrations indices while inequity is assessed using a horizontal equity index: an index of inequity across socioeconomic status groups, based on standardizing health service utilisation for health care need. Public health services considered include public health post visits, public clinic visits, public hospital visits and total public facility visits. Results: There is evidence of pro-poor inequality in public primary health care utilisation but a pro-rich inequality in hospital visits. The concentration indices for public health post visits and public clinic visits are -0.28 and -0.09 respectively while that of public hospitals is 0.06. After controlling for need, the pro-poor distribution is maintained at primary facilities and with a pro-rich distribution at hospitals. The horizontal equity indices for health post and clinic are estimated at -0.23 and -0.04 respectively while that of public hospitals is estimated at 0.11. A pro-rich inequity is observed when all the public facilities are combined (horizontal equity index = 0.01) though statistically insignificant. Conclusion: The results of the paper point to areas of focus in ensuring equitable access to health services especially for the poor and needy. This includes strengthening primary facilities that serve the poor and reducing access barriers to ensure that health care utilisation at higher-level facilities is distributed in accordance with need for it. These initiatives may well reduce the observed inequities and accelerate the move towards universal health coverage in Zambia.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Akazili J, 2010, THESIS CAPETOWN U
[2]  
Almqvist A, 2010, SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ANAL HLTH EQUITY USI
[4]   Paying for and receiving benefits from health services in South Africa: is the health system equitable? [J].
Ataguba, John E. ;
McIntyre, Di .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2012, 27 :i35-i45
[5]   Socioeconomic-related health inequality in South Africa: evidence from General Household Surveys [J].
Ataguba, John E. ;
Akazili, James ;
McIntyre, Di .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2011, 10
[6]   Who benefits from health services in South Africa? [J].
Ataguba, John Ele-Ojo ;
McIntyre, Di .
HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW, 2013, 8 (01) :21-46
[7]   India: Towards Universal Health Coverage 4 Health care and equity in India [J].
Balarajan, Y. ;
Selvaraj, S. ;
Subramanian, S. V. .
LANCET, 2011, 377 (9764) :505-515
[8]   User-payment, decentralization and health service utilization in Zambia [J].
Blas, E ;
Limbambala, M .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2001, 16 :19-28
[9]  
Bonfrer I, 2012, WORKING PAPER W2012
[10]   Socioeconomic status in health research - One size does not fit all [J].
Braveman, PA ;
Cubbin, C ;
Egerter, S ;
Chideya, S ;
Marchi, KS ;
Metzler, M ;
Posner, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (22) :2879-2888