Optimal Operational Strategy for Power Producers in Korea Considering Renewable Portfolio Standards and Emissions Trading Schemes

被引:13
作者
Son, Dongmin [1 ]
Kim, Joonrak [1 ]
Jeong, Bongju [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Ind Engn, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
renewable portfolio standards; emissions trading scheme; optimal operational strategy; generation expansion plan; energy planning; CAPACITY EXPANSION; ENERGY-SOURCES; MODEL; SECTOR; UNCERTAINTIES; OPTIMIZATION; PENETRATION; EFFICIENCY; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/en12091667
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Globally, many countries are experiencing economic growth while concurrently increasing their energy consumption. Several have begun to consider a low-carbon energy mix to mitigate the environmental impacts caused by increased fossil fuel consumption. In terms of maximizing profits, however, power producers are not sufficiently motivated to expand capacity due to high costs. Thus, the Korean government initiated the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), an obligation to generate a certain proportion of a producer's total generation using renewable energy for power producers with capacities of 500 MW or more, and the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), designed to attain a carbon emissions reduction goal. We propose a mathematical model to derive the optimal operational strategy for maximizing power producer profits with a capacity expansion plan that meets both regulations. As such, the main purpose of this study was to obtain the optimal operational strategy for each obligatory power producer. To that end, we defined a 2 x 2 matrix to classify their types and to conduct scenario-based analyses to assess the impact of major factor changes on solutions for each type of power producer. Finally, for the power generation industry to operate in a sustainable and eco-friendly manner, we extracted policy implications that the Korean government could consider for each type of power producer.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Power System Capacity Expansion Under Higher Penetration of Renewables Considering Flexibility Constraints and Low Carbon Policies
    Chen, Xinyu
    Lv, Jiajun
    McElroy, Michael B.
    Han, Xingning
    Nielsen, Chris P.
    Wen, Jinyu
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (06) : 6240 - 6253
  • [12] Quantitatively exploring the future of renewable portfolio standard in the Korean electricity sector via a bottom-up energy model
    Choi, Dong Gu
    Park, Sang Yong
    Hong, Jong Chul
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 : 793 - 803
  • [13] Two-Stage Robust Generation Expansion Planning: A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Model
    Dehghan, Shahab
    Amjady, Nima
    Kazemi, Ahad
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (02) : 584 - 597
  • [14] The European low-carbon mix for 2030: The role of renewable energy sources in an environmentally and socially efficient approach
    deLlano-Paz, Fernando
    Calvo-Silvosa, Anxo
    Iglesias Antelo, Susana
    Soares, Isabel
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 48 : 49 - 61
  • [15] Fang Li, 2016, Logistics Research, V9, DOI 10.1007/s12159-016-0135-x
  • [16] Energy efficiency resource modeling in generation expansion planning
    Ghaderi, A.
    Moghaddam, M. Parsa
    Sheikh-El-Eslami, M. K.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 68 : 529 - 537
  • [17] Risk based multiobjective generation expansion planning considering renewable energy sources
    Gitizadeh, Mohsen
    Kaji, Mahdi
    Aghaei, Jamshid
    [J]. ENERGY, 2013, 50 : 74 - 82
  • [18] Reliability constrained generation expansion planning with consideration of wind farms uncertainties in deregulated electricity market
    Hemmati, Reza
    Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah
    Khodabakhshian, Amin
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 76 : 517 - 526
  • [19] Optimizing an emission trading scheme for local governments: A Stackelberg game model and hybrid algorithm
    Hong, Zhaofu
    Chu, Chengbin
    Zhang, Linda L.
    Yu, Yugang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2017, 193 : 172 - 182
  • [20] The construction of Shenzhen's carbon emission trading scheme
    Jiang, Jing Jing
    Ye, Bin
    Ma, Xiao Ming
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 : 17 - 21