Optimal Operational Strategy for Power Producers in Korea Considering Renewable Portfolio Standards and Emissions Trading Schemes

被引:13
作者
Son, Dongmin [1 ]
Kim, Joonrak [1 ]
Jeong, Bongju [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Ind Engn, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
renewable portfolio standards; emissions trading scheme; optimal operational strategy; generation expansion plan; energy planning; CAPACITY EXPANSION; ENERGY-SOURCES; MODEL; SECTOR; UNCERTAINTIES; OPTIMIZATION; PENETRATION; EFFICIENCY; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/en12091667
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Globally, many countries are experiencing economic growth while concurrently increasing their energy consumption. Several have begun to consider a low-carbon energy mix to mitigate the environmental impacts caused by increased fossil fuel consumption. In terms of maximizing profits, however, power producers are not sufficiently motivated to expand capacity due to high costs. Thus, the Korean government initiated the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), an obligation to generate a certain proportion of a producer's total generation using renewable energy for power producers with capacities of 500 MW or more, and the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), designed to attain a carbon emissions reduction goal. We propose a mathematical model to derive the optimal operational strategy for maximizing power producer profits with a capacity expansion plan that meets both regulations. As such, the main purpose of this study was to obtain the optimal operational strategy for each obligatory power producer. To that end, we defined a 2 x 2 matrix to classify their types and to conduct scenario-based analyses to assess the impact of major factor changes on solutions for each type of power producer. Finally, for the power generation industry to operate in a sustainable and eco-friendly manner, we extracted policy implications that the Korean government could consider for each type of power producer.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Optimal allocation of energy sources for sustainable development in South Korea: Focus on the electric power generation industry
    Ahn, Joongha
    Woo, JongRoul
    Lee, Jongsu
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 78 : 78 - 90
  • [2] [Anonymous], TP500063267 NREL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, Projected Costs of Generating Electricity
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, CARDOZO J INT COMP L, V20, P1
  • [5] A multiple objective mixed integer linear programming model for power generation expansion planning
    Antunes, CH
    Martins, AG
    Brito, IS
    [J]. ENERGY, 2004, 29 (04) : 613 - 627
  • [6] A retrospective analysis of benefits and impacts of US renewable portfolio standards
    Barbose, Galen
    Wiser, Ryan
    Heeter, Jenny
    Mai, Trieu
    Bird, Lori
    Bolinger, Mark
    Carpenter, Alberta
    Heath, Garvin
    Keyser, David
    Macknick, Jordan
    Mills, Andrew
    Millstein, Dev
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 96 : 645 - 660
  • [7] Power sector investment risk and renewable energy: A Japanese case study using portfolio risk optimization method
    Bhattacharya, Anindya
    Kojima, Satoshi
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 40 : 69 - 80
  • [8] The relationship between European electricity markets and emission allowance futures prices in phase II of the EU (European Union) emission trading scheme
    Boersen, Arieke
    Scholtens, Bert
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 74 : 585 - 594
  • [9] Empirical Estimates of the Influence of Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards on the Green Economies of States
    Bowen, William M.
    Park, Sunjoo
    Elvery, Joel A.
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2013, 27 (04) : 338 - 351
  • [10] Power Generation Expansion Planning Model Towards Low-Carbon Economy and Its Application in China
    Chen, Qixin
    Kang, Chongqing
    Xia, Qing
    Zhong, Jin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (02) : 1117 - 1125