Handheld vs. Laptop Computers for Electronic Data Collection in Clinical Research: A Crossover Randomized Trial

被引:36
|
作者
Haller, Guy [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Haller, Dagmar M. [4 ,6 ]
Courvoisier, Delphine S. [2 ]
Lovis, Christian [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Dept Anesthesiol, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Univ Hosp Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Clin Epidemiol, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[3] Univ Geneva, Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Med Informat, Unit Clin Informat, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Community Med & Primary Care, Fac Med, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[5] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Dept Gen Practice, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; PDA USE; YOUTH; CARE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1197/jamia.M3041
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare users' speed, number of entry errors and satisfaction in using two current devices for electronic data collection in clinical research: handheld and laptop computers. Design: The authors performed a randomized cross-over trial using 160 different paper-based questionnaires and representing altogether 45,440 variables. Four data coders were instructed to record, according to a random predefined and equally balanced sequence, the content of these questionnaires either on a laptop or on a handheld computer. Instructions on the kind of device to be used were provided to data-coders in individual sealed and opaque envelopes. Study conditions were controlled and the data entry process performed in a quiet environment. Measurements: The authors compared the duration of the data recording process, the number of errors and users' satisfaction with the two devices. The authors divided errors into two separate categories, typing and missing data errors. The original paper-based questionnaire was used as a gold-standard. Results: The overall duration of the recording process was significantly reduced (2.0 versus 3.3 min) when data were recorded on the laptop computer (p < 0.001). Data accuracy also improved. There were 5.8 typing errors per 1,000 entries with the laptop compared to 8.4 per 1,000 with the handheld computer (p < 0.001). The difference was even more important for missing data which decreased from 22.8 to 2.9 per 1,000 entries when a laptop was used (p < 0.001.). Users found the laptop easier, faster and more satisfying to use than the handheld computer. Conclusions: Despite the increasing use of handheld computers for electronic data collection in clinical research, these devices should be used with caution. They double the duration of the data entry process and significantly increase the risk of typing errors and missing data. This may become a particularly crucial issue in Studies where these devices are provided to patients or healthcare workers, unfamiliar with Computer Technologies, for self-reporting or research data collection processes.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 659
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Feasibility of Integrating Research Data Collection into Routine Clinical Practice Using the Electronic Health Record
    Chalmers, David J.
    Deakyne, Sara J.
    Payan, Marisa L.
    Torok, Michelle R.
    Kahn, Michael G.
    Vemulakonda, Vijaya M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (04) : 1215 - 1220
  • [2] Integrating Data Collection Into Office Work Flow and Electronic Health Records for Clinical Outcomes Research
    Colaianni, C. Alessandra
    Levesque, Patricia A.
    Lindsay, Robin W.
    JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 19 (06) : 528 - 532
  • [3] Randomized clinical trial analyzing maintenance of peripheral venous catheters in an internal medicine unit: Heparin vs. saline
    Jesus Perez-Granda, Maria
    Bouza, Emilio
    Pinilla, Blanca
    Cruces, Raquel
    Gonzalez, Ariana
    Millan, Jesus
    Guembe, Maria
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [4] Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist vs. pressure support to deliver protective mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized crossover trial
    Diniz-Silva, Fabia
    Moriya, Henrique T.
    Alencar, Adriano M.
    Amato, Marcelo B. P.
    Carvalho, Carlos R. R.
    Ferreira, Juliana C.
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [5] A randomized clinical trial of in-person vs. home-based telemedicine delivery of Prolonged Exposure for PTSD in military sexual trauma survivors
    Acierno, Ron
    Jaffe, Anna E.
    Gilmore, Amanda K.
    Birks, Anna
    Denier, Carol
    Muzzy, Wendy
    Lopez, Cristina M.
    Tuerk, Peter
    Grubaugh, Anouk L.
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2021, 83
  • [6] The COPE-Trial-Communicating prognosis to parents in the neonatal ICU: Optimistic vs. PEssimistic: study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial using two different scripted video vignettes to explore communication preferences of parents of preterm infants
    Forth, Fiona A.
    Hammerle, Florian
    Koenig, Jochem
    Urschitz, Michael S.
    Neuweiler, Philipp
    Mildenberger, Eva
    Kidszun, Andre
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [7] A randomized trial of comparing video telecare education vs. in-person education on dietary regimen compliance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a support for clinical telehealth Providers
    Molavynejad, Shahram
    Miladinia, Mojtaba
    Jahangiri, Mina
    BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] A randomized clinical trial of motivational interviewing plus skills training vs. Relaxation plus education and 12-Steps for substance using incarcerated youth: Effects on alcohol, marijuana and crimes of aggression
    Stein, L. A. R.
    Martin, Rosemarie
    Clair-Michaud, Mary
    Lebeau, Rebecca
    Hurlbut, Warren
    Kahler, Christopher W.
    Monti, Peter M.
    Rohsenow, Damaris
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2020, 207
  • [9] Evaluation of the Effect of Pressure-Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed Mode vs. Volume-Controlled Ventilation Mode on Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Turan Civraz, Ayse Zeynep
    Saracoglu, Ayten
    Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (10):
  • [10] Correctly structured problem lists lead to better and faster clinical decision-making in electronic health records compared to non-curated problem lists: A single-blinded crossover randomized controlled trial
    Klappe, Eva S.
    Heijmans, Jarom
    Groen, Kaz
    ter Schure, Judith
    Cornet, Ronald
    de Keizer, Nicolette F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 180