Fuzzy seismic fragility analysis of gravity dams considering spatial variability of material parameters

被引:36
作者
Li, Zefa [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Zhenyu [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Jiankang [1 ,2 ]
Pei, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Xiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul & Mt River Engn, 24 South Sect 1,Yihuan Rd, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Coll Water Resources & Hydropower, 24 South Sect 1,Yihuan Rd, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Gravity dams; Seismic fragility; Spatial variability; Random fields; Fuzziness; Uncertain factors; NONLINEAR DYNAMIC-RESPONSE; PLASTIC-DAMAGE MODEL; INTENSITY MEASURES; NEAR-FAULT; CRACKING; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106439
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Due to the heterogeneity of massive concrete and unevenness of pouring process, concrete strengths in gravity dams show obvious spatial variability. In addition, since the evolution of damage states for gravity dams is a gradually transitional process, the threshold between adjacent damage states is ambiguous. A mathematical model for describing the fuzziness of damage states threshold is presented. And a methodology for fuzzy seismic fragility analysis of gravity dams considering spatial variability of material parameters is proposed by combining nonlinear dynamic analysis of dam-reservoir-foundation system, Hariri-Ardebili's damage quantification method and an approach for simulation of random field of material parameters. The seismic fragility of gravity dams was investigated to illustrate the proposed methodology. It is found that the spatial variability of concrete tensile strength leads the seismic damage of the dam to be spatially varying as well. The damage of dam body intensifies and the probability of exceeding for each damage state increases. The fuzzy seismic fragility curves are insensitive to the types of membership function (linear, mountain and polynomial). Due to the influence of frequency distribution of damage index, the effects of variation in the size of the fuzzy interval of threshold on seismic fragility curves are different. The probability of exceeding of each damage state for gravity dams obviously increases when the spatial variability of tensile strength and fuzziness of damage states threshold are considered simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of gravity dams [J].
Alembagheri, M. ;
Seyedkazemi, M. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2015, 44 (01) :41-58
[3]   Categorization of Damage Index of Concrete Gravity Dam for the Health Monitoring after Earthquake [J].
Ansari, Md Imteyaz ;
Agarwal, Pankaj .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 20 (08) :1222-1238
[4]   Seismic Fragility of Concrete Gravity Dams with Spatial Variation of Angle of Friction: Case Study [J].
Bernier, Carl ;
Padgett, Jamie E. ;
Proulx, Jean ;
Paultre, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (05)
[5]   SEISMIC CRACKING AND ENERGY-DISSIPATION IN CONCRETE GRAVITY DAMS [J].
BHATTACHARJEE, SS ;
LEGER, P .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1993, 22 (11) :991-1007
[6]   Seismic fracture analysis of concrete gravity dams including dam-reservoir interaction [J].
Calayir, Y ;
Karaton, M .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2005, 83 (19-20) :1595-1606
[7]  
Cervera M, 1996, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V25, P987, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199609)25:9<987::AID-EQE599>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-X
[9]   A simple model to include fuzziness in the seismic fragility curve and relevant effect compared with randomness [J].
Colangelo, Felice .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 41 (05) :969-986
[10]   A fuzzy-random analysis model for seismic performance of framed structures incorporating structural and non-structural damage [J].
Gu, XM ;
Lu, Y .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2005, 34 (10) :1305-1321