Local land-use decision-making in a global context

被引:69
|
作者
Malek, Ziga [1 ]
Douwi, Bianka [1 ]
Van Vliet, Jasper [1 ]
Van Der Zanden, Emma H. [2 ]
Verburg, Peter H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, Environm Geog Grp, De Boelelaan 1087, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, IIS, Sci Pk 904, NL-1090 GE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Res Unit Landscape Dynam, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
land use; underlying drivers; typology; systematic review; meta-analysis; COVER CHANGE; DRIVING FORCES; HUMAN-BEHAVIOR; EARTH SYSTEM; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS; IMPACTS; MODELS; DESERTIFICATION; INTENSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ab309e
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land-use change has transformed the majority of the terrestrial biosphere, impacting biodiversity, climate change, food production and provision of multiple ecosystem services. To improve our understanding of land-use change processes, the motivations and characteristics of land-use decision-makers need to be addressed more explicitly. Here, we systematically review the peer-reviewed literature between 1950 and 2018 that documents decision-making underlying land-use change processes. We found 315 publications reporting on 559 case studies worldwide that report on land-use decision-making in sufficient depth. In these cases, we identified 758 land-use decision-makers. We clustered decision-makers based on their objectives, attitudes and abilities into six distinct types: survivalist, subsistence-oriented smallholder, market-oriented smallholder, professional commercialist, professional intensifier and eco-agriculturalist. Survival and livelihood were identified as most common objectives for land-use decision makers, followed by economic objectives. We observe large differences in terms of decision-makers' attitudes towards environmental values, and particularly their financial status, while decision makers have a generally favorable attitude towards change and legislation. The majority of the documented decision-makers in the literature have only few abilities as they are poor and own small plots of land, while the wealthier decision-makers were identified to have more power and control over their decisions. Based on a representativeness analysis, we found that decision-making processes in marginal areas, such as mountainous regions, are overrepresented in existing case study evidence, while remote areas and lowlands are under-represented. These insights can help in the design of better land-use change assessments, as well as to improve policies towards sustainable land use.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条