ADDITIVE SELF-HELICITY AS A KINK MODE THRESHOLD

被引:12
作者
Malanushenko, A. [1 ]
Longcope, D. W. [1 ]
Fan, Y. [2 ]
Gibson, S. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Montana State Univ, Dept Phys, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[2] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, High Altitude Observ, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
关键词
instabilities; magnetic fields; Sun: corona; Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs); Sun: flares; Sun: magnetic fields; CORONAL MAGNETIC-FIELDS; HYDROMAGNETIC STABILITY; FLUX TUBES; LOOPS; INSTABILITY; EMERGENCE; FLARES;
D O I
10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/580
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
In this paper, we propose that additive self-helicity, introduced by Longcope and Malanushenko, plays a role in the kink instability for complex equilibria, similar to twist helicity for thin flux tubes. We support this hypothesis by a calculation of additive self-helicity of a twisted flux tube from the simulation of Fan and Gibson. As more twist gets introduced, the additive self-helicity increases, and the kink instability of the tube coincides with the drop of additive self-helicity, after the latter reaches the value of H(A)/Phi(2) approximate to 1.5 (where Phi is the flux of the tube and H(A) is the additive self-helicity). We compare the additive self-helicity to twist for a thin subportion of the tube to illustrate that H(A)/Phi(2) is equal to the twist number, studied by Berger and Field, when the thin flux tube approximation is applicable. We suggest that the quantity H(A)/Phi(2) could be treated as a generalization of a twist number, when the thin flux tube approximation is not applicable. A threshold on a generalized twist number might prove extremely useful studying complex equilibria, just as the twist number itself has proven useful studying idealized thin flux tubes. We explicitly describe a numerical method for calculating additive self-helicity, which includes an algorithm for identifying a domain occupied by a flux bundle and a method of calculating potential magnetic field confined to this domain. We also describe a numerical method to calculate twist of a thin flux tube, using a frame parallelly transported along the axis of the tube.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 592
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   On the MHD stability of the m=1 kink mode in solar coronal loops [J].
Baty, H .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2001, 367 (01) :321-325
[2]   THE TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC HELICITY [J].
BERGER, MA ;
FIELD, GB .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1984, 147 (OCT) :133-148
[3]   AN ENERGY PRINCIPLE FOR HYDROMAGNETIC STABILITY PROBLEMS [J].
BERNSTEIN, IB ;
FRIEMAN, EA ;
KRUSKAL, MD ;
KULSRUD, RM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1958, 244 (1236) :17-40
[4]   Magnetic helicity generation by solar differential rotation [J].
DeVore, CR .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 539 (02) :944-953
[5]   The emergence of a twisted magnetic flux tube into a preexisting coronal arcade [J].
Fan, Y ;
Gibson, SE .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 589 (02) :L105-L108
[6]   Numerical simulations of three-dimensional coronal magnetic fields resulting from the emergence of twisted magnetic flux tubes [J].
Fan, Y ;
Gibson, SE .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 609 (02) :1123-1133
[7]  
Finn J. M., 1985, Comments on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, V9, P111
[8]   KINK INSTABILITY OF SOLAR CORONAL LOOPS AS THE CAUSE OF SOLAR-FLARES [J].
HOOD, AW ;
PRIEST, ER .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1979, 64 (02) :303-321
[9]   CRITICAL CONDITIONS FOR MAGNETIC INSTABILITIES IN FORCE-FREE CORONAL LOOPS [J].
HOOD, AW ;
PRIEST, ER .
GEOPHYSICAL AND ASTROPHYSICAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 1981, 17 (3-4) :297-318
[10]  
LeVeque R.J., 1955, FINITE DIFFERENCE ME