Group Decision Making for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modelling Software Selection with AHP

被引:1
|
作者
Cetinyokus, Saliha [1 ]
Caliskan, Emre [2 ]
Aksakal, Erdem [3 ]
Cetinyokus, Tahsin [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Tech Sci Vocat Sch, Mat & Mat Proc Technol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Ataturk Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Erzurum, Turkey
来源
IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING-INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH EDITION | 2020年 / 39卷 / 03期
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; Group decision making; Hazard analysis and consequence modelling software; Likert scale; Software selection; SIMULATION SOFTWARE; HIERARCHY PROCESS; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; CRITERIA; ERP; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; DESIGN; METHODOLOGY; DEPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.30492/IJCCE.2020.34118
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Software evaluation and selection have begun to be addressed as a topic title along with the fact that microcomputers and then personal computers have become widespread and have been used in the operations of businesses. In this study, it was focused on the selection of software for identifying the physical effect distances of the explosion, fire and toxic emission, which is an important need for industrial institutions containing, using or storing hazardous chemicals. The evaluation and selection of software for the Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modeling (HACM) of potential accidents was studied at first. In means of methodology, questionnaires consisting of original questions were applied to the experts. The results obtained from questionnaires according to the Likert scale, were converted into Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) suggestion matrices. In this way the inconsistency problem in the pairwise comparison matrices were eliminated. As a result, evaluation and selection were made among the HACM softwares.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 318
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enterprise modelling for decision-making in the software ecosystem
    Rani, Anshul
    Mishra, Deepti
    Omerovic, Aida
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [32] Group decision-making in software architecture: A study on industrial practices
    Rekha, Smrithi, V
    Muccini, Henry
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 101 : 51 - 63
  • [33] TWO-STAGE PRIORITIZATION PROCEDURE FOR MULTIPLICATIVE AHP-GROUP DECISION MAKING
    Lin, Changsheng
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Alsaadi, Fawaz E.
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2020, 26 (02) : 525 - 545
  • [34] ASSESSMENT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY BY USING AHP METHOD TOGETHER WITH GROUP DECISION MAKING
    Stankova, Stepanka
    8TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2014, : 1430 - 1440
  • [35] Managing transitivity and consistency of preferences in AHP group decision making based on minimum modifications
    Wu, Zhibin
    Tu, Jiancheng
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2021, 67 (67) : 125 - 135
  • [36] The precise consistency consensus matrix in a local AHP-group decision making context
    Aguaron, Juan
    Teresa Escobar, Maria
    Maria Moreno-Jimenez, Jose
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 245 (1-2) : 245 - 259
  • [37] Synthesis of individual best local priority vectors in AHP-group decision making
    Srdjevic, Bojan
    Srdjevic, Zorica
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (04) : 2045 - 2056
  • [38] A Group Decision-Making Approach Based on DST and AHP for New Product Selection under Epistemic Uncertainty
    Wu, Chong
    Zhang, Zijiao
    Zhong, Wei
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [39] A Fuzzy Stochastic Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Approach for Selection Problems
    Mousavi, S. Meysam
    Jolai, Fariborz
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2013, 22 (02) : 207 - 233
  • [40] A consensus based group decision making methodology for strategic selection problems of supply chain coordination
    Singh, R. K.
    Benyoucef, Lyes
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 26 (01) : 122 - 134