Multidetector computed tomography arthrography of the knee: Diagnostic accuracy and indications

被引:41
作者
De Filippo, Massimo [1 ]
Bertellini, Annalisa [1 ]
Pogliacomi, Francesco [2 ]
Sverzellati, Nicola [1 ]
Corradi, Domenico [3 ]
Garlaschi, Giacomo [4 ]
Zompatori, Maurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Parma Hosp, Dept Clin Sci, Sect Radiol Sci, I-43100 Parma, Italy
[2] Univ Parma, Parma Hosp, Dept Surg, I-43100 Parma, Italy
[3] Univ Parma, Parma Hosp, Dept Anat, I-43100 Parma, Italy
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Radiol, I-16126 Genoa, Italy
关键词
Arthro-MDCT; MRI; Knee; SPIRAL CT ARTHROGRAPHY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; MULTISLICE; CARTILAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.034
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and indications of arthrography with multidetector computed tomography (arthro-MDCT) of the knee, in patients with absolute or relative contraindications to MRI and in patients with periarticular metal implants using diagnostic arthroscopy as the gold standard. Materials and methods: After intra-articular injection of iodixanol and volumetric acquisition, 68 knees in patients of both sexes (30 females, 38 males, age range 32-60 years) were examined with a 16-detector-row CT scanner. The patients had arthralgia but no radiologically detected fractures. They could not be studied by MRI either because of absolute contraindications (subcutaneous electronic implants), surgical metal implants or claustrophobia. In 37 of 68 patients who had had previous knee surgery, the arthro-CT examination was preceded by an MRI on the same day. All examinations were interpreted by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. The findings were compared with arthroscopic findings carried out within 28 days of the CT study. Results: In non-operated patients the comparison between arthro-MDCT and arthroscopy showed sensitivity and specificity ranging between 86% and 100%. In the 37 operated knees, arthro-MDCT had an accuracy of 95% compared with 53% of the MRI. Inter-observer agreement was almost perfect (K = 0.97) in the evaluation of all types lesions, both on MDCT and MRI. When arthro-MDCT was compared with MRI in post-operative patients by a McNemar test, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between these two techniques. Conclusions: Arthro-MDCT of the knee is a safe technique that provides accurate diagnosis in identifying chondral, fibrocartilaginous and intra-articular ligamentous lesions, in patients that cannot be evaluated by MRI, and in patients after surgical. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 351
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] ROTATOR CUFF LESIONS OF THE SHOULDER - EVALUATION BY DIRECT SAGITTAL CT ARTHROGRAPHY
    BELTRAN, J
    GRAY, LA
    BOOLS, JC
    ZUELZER, W
    WEIS, LD
    UNVERFERTH, LJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1986, 160 (01) : 161 - 165
  • [2] Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey
    Brix, G
    Nagel, HD
    Stamm, G
    Veit, R
    Lechel, U
    Griebel, J
    Galanski, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (08) : 1979 - 1991
  • [3] COMPARISON OF CORRELATED CORRELATIONS
    COHEN, A
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1989, 8 (12) : 1485 - 1495
  • [4] MENISCAL TEARS OF THE KNEE - ACCURACY OF MR IMAGING
    CRUES, JV
    MINK, J
    LEVY, TL
    LOTYSCH, M
    STOLLER, DW
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (02) : 445 - 448
  • [5] MATCHMAKING AND MCNEMAR IN THE COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC MODALITIES
    DWYER, AJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (02) : 328 - 330
  • [6] El-Khoury GY, 2004, J AM ACAD ORTHOP SUR, V12, P1
  • [7] Site and size of rotator-cuff tear - Findings at ultrasound, double-contrast arthrography, and computed tomography arthrography with surgical correlation
    Farin, PU
    Kaukanen, E
    Jaroma, H
    Vaatainen, U
    Miettinen, H
    Soimakallio, S
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1996, 31 (07) : 387 - 394
  • [8] Musculoskeletal Imaging with Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: When is Computed Tomography the Study of Choice?
    Fayad, Laura M.
    Bluemke, David A.
    Fishman, Elliot K.
    [J]. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (06) : 220 - 237
  • [9] Musculoskeletal radiology: Then and now
    Feldman, F
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (02) : 309 - 316
  • [10] Hailey D, 2006, Issues Emerg Health Technol, P1