Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: Diastolic Function Differences Depending on Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction

被引:5
|
作者
Horodinschi, Ruxandra-Nicoleta [1 ,2 ]
Diaconu, Camelia Cristina [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Dept 5, Bucharest 050474, Romania
[2] Clin Emergency Hosp Bucharest, Cardiol Clin, Bucharest 014461, Romania
[3] Clin Emergency Hosp Bucharest, Internal Med Clin, Bucharest 014461, Romania
关键词
heart failure; atrial fibrillation; diastolic function; DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FILLING PRESSURE; CONDUIT FUNCTION; E/E' RATIO; DYSFUNCTION; VOLUME; RECOMMENDATIONS; MORTALITY; DIAGNOSIS; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12040839
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are prevalent cardiovascular diseases, and their association is common. Diastolic dysfunction may be present in patients with AF and all types of HF, leading to elevated intracardiac pressures. The objective of this study was to analyze diastolic dysfunction in patients with HF and AF depending on left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). Material and methods: This prospective study included 324 patients with chronic HF and AF (paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent) hospitalized between January 2018 and March 2021. The inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years, diagnosis of chronic HF and AF, and available echocardiographic data. The exclusion criteria were a suboptimal echocardiographic view, other cardiac rhythms than AF, congenital heart disease, or coronavirus 2 infection. Patients were divided into three subgroups according to LVEF: subgroup 1 included 203 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and AF (62.65%), subgroup 2 included 42 patients with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and AF (12.96%), and subgroup 3 included 79 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and AF (24.38%). We performed 2D transthoracic echocardiography in all patients. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Results: The E/e' ratio (p = 0.0352, OR 1.9) and left atrial volume index (56.4 mL/m(2) vs. 53.6 mL/m(2)) were higher in patients with HFrEF than in those with HFpEF. Conclusions: Patients with HFrEF and AF had more severe diastolic dysfunction and higher left ventricular filling pressures than those with HFpEF and AF.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diastolic function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: impact of diabetes
    Horodinschi, Ruxandra-Nicoleta
    Diaconu, Camelia Cristina
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE, 2021, 11 (05): : 564 - 575
  • [2] Diagnosing diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with atrial fibrillation: a clinical challenge
    Beladan, Carmen C.
    Gual-Capllonch, Francisco
    Popescu, Andreea C.
    Popescu, Bogdan A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2024, 25 (11) : 1546 - 1553
  • [3] The Stiff Left Atrium Is to Atrial Fibrillation as the Stiff Left Ventricle Is to Diastolic Heart Failure
    Naqvi, Tasneem Z.
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 9 (03)
  • [4] Left atrial strain evaluation to assess left ventricle diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a guide to clinical practice Left atrial strain and diastolic function
    Silva, Mariana Ribeiro
    Sampaio, Francisco
    Braga, Joana
    Ribeiro, Jose
    Fontes-Carvalho, Ricardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2023, 39 (06) : 1083 - 1096
  • [5] Left atrial strain evaluation to assess left ventricle diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a guide to clinical practiceLeft atrial strain and diastolic function
    Mariana Ribeiro Silva
    Francisco Sampaio
    Joana Braga
    José Ribeiro
    Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2023, 39 : 1083 - 1096
  • [6] Impaired Left Atrial Reserve Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Kagami, Kazuki
    Harada, Tomonari
    Yuasa, Naoki
    Saito, Yuki
    Sorimachi, Hidemi
    Murakami, Fumitaka
    Naito, Ayami
    Tani, Yuta
    Kato, Toshimitsu
    Wada, Naoki
    Adachi, Takeshi
    Ishii, Hideki
    Obokata, Masaru
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2024, 17 (08) : e016549
  • [7] The association of heart failure across left ventricular ejection fraction with mortality in atrial fibrillation
    Kartas, Anastasios
    Samaras, Athanasios
    Akrivos, Evangelos
    Vrana, Eleni
    Papazoglou, Andreas S.
    Moysidis, Dimitrios, V
    Papanastasiou, Anastasios
    Baroutidou, Amalia
    Botis, Michail
    Liampas, Evangelos
    Vouloagkas, Ioannis
    Karagiannidis, Efstratios
    Karvounis, Haralambos
    Parissis, John
    Tzikas, Apostolos
    Giannakoulas, George
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (04): : 3189 - 3197
  • [8] Influence of Left Atrial Function on Exercise Capacity and Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction
    von Roeder, Maximilian
    Rommel, Karl-Philipp
    Kowallick, Johannes Tammo
    Blazek, Stephan
    Besler, Christian
    Fengler, Karl
    Lotz, Joachim
    Hasenfuss, Gerd
    Luecke, Christian
    Gutberlet, Matthias
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Schuster, Andreas
    Lurz, Philipp
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 10 (04)
  • [9] Left Atrial Systolic and Diastolic Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
    Morris, Daniel A.
    Gailani, Mudather
    Perez, Amalia Vaz
    Blaschke, Florian
    Dietz, Rainer
    Haverkamp, Wilhelm
    Oezcelik, Cemil
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2011, 24 (06) : 651 - 662
  • [10] Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Atrial Fibrillation A review
    Manea, Maria
    Marcu, Dragos
    Stoian, Anca Pantea
    Gaman, Mihnea Alexandru
    Gaman, Amelia Maria
    Socea, Bogdan
    Neagu, Tiberiu Paul
    Stanescu, Ana Maria Alexandra
    Bratu, Ovidiu Gabriel
    Diaconu, Camelia Cristina
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2018, 69 (11): : 4180 - 4184