How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model

被引:266
作者
Wallace, L
Keil, M
Rai, A
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Accounting & Informat Syst, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Dept Comp Informat Syst, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Ctr Proc Innovat, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02059.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
To reduce the high failure rate of software projects, managers need better tools to assess and manage software project risk. In order to create such tools, however, information systems researchers must first develop a better understanding of the dimensions of software project risk and how they can affect project performance. Progress in this area has been hindered by: (1) a lack of validated instruments for measuring software project risk that tap into the dimensions of risk that are seen as important by software project managers, and (2) a lack of theory to explain the linkages between various dimensions of software project risk and project performance. In this study, six dimensions of software project risk were identified and reliable and valid measures were developed for each. Guided by sociotechnical systems theory, an exploratory model was developed and tested. The results show that social subsystem risk influences technical subsystem risk, which, in turn, influences the level of project management risk, and ultimately, project performance. The implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 321
页数:33
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Abdel-Hamid T. K., 1989, Journal of Management Information Systems, V6, P21
  • [2] A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul
    Allen, Jim
    O'Connell, James F.
    [J]. ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [3] ALTER S, 1978, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V20, P23
  • [4] STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH
    ANDERSON, JC
    GERBING, DW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) : 411 - 423
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1994, ASSESSMENT CONTROL S
  • [6] ARBUCKLE JL, 1999, AMOS WINDOW ANAL MON
  • [7] Arrow K., 1970, Essays in the theory of risk-bearing
  • [8] Bagozzi R.P., 1988, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V16, P74, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1007/BF02723327]
  • [9] REPRESENTING AND TESTING ORGANIZATIONAL THEORIES - A HOLISTIC CONSTRUAL
    BAGOZZI, RP
    PHILLIPS, LW
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1982, 27 (03) : 459 - 489
  • [10] Barki H., 1993, Journal of Management Information Systems, V10, P203