Using multiple group modeling to test moderators in meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Schoemann, Alexander M. [1 ]
机构
[1] East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
meta-analysis; structural equation model; multiple group model; random-effects model; mixed-effects model; HETEROGENEITY; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1002/jrsm.1200
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis is a popular and flexible analysis that can be fit in many modeling frameworks. Two methods of fitting meta-analyses that are growing in popularity are structural equation modeling (SEM) and multilevel modeling (MLM). By using SEM or MLM to fit a meta-analysis researchers have access to powerful techniques associated with SEM and MLM. This paper details how to use one such technique, multiple group analysis, to test categorical moderators in meta-analysis. In a multiple group meta-analysis a model is fit to each level of the moderator simultaneously. By constraining parameters across groups any model parameter can be tested for equality. Using multiple groups to test for moderators is especially relevant in random-effects meta-analysis where both the mean and the between studies variance of the effect size may be compared across groups. A simulation study and the analysis of a real data set are used to illustrate multiple group modeling with both SEM and MLM. Issues related to multiple group meta-analysis and future directions for research are discussed. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 401
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring the Effectiveness and Moderators of Augmented Reality on Science Learning: a Meta-analysis
    Wen-Wen Xu
    Chien-Yuan Su
    Yue Hu
    Cheng-Huan Chen
    Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2022, 31 : 621 - 637
  • [42] Team Learning Behaviors and Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Direct Effects and Moderators
    Wiese, Christopher W.
    Burke, C. Shawn
    Tang, Yichen
    Hernandez, Claudia
    Howell, Ryan
    GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 47 (03) : 571 - 611
  • [43] A flexible approach to identify interaction effects between moderators in meta-analysis
    Li, Xinru
    Dusseldorp, Elise
    Meulman, Jacqueline J.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2019, 10 (01) : 134 - 152
  • [44] A meta-analysis of parent training: Moderators and follow-up effects
    Lundahl, B
    Risser, HJ
    Lovejoy, MC
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 26 (01) : 86 - 104
  • [45] Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis Including Moderators: Empirical Validation
    Moeyaert, Mariola
    Yang, Panpan
    Xue, Yukang
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2024, 92 (04) : 723 - 740
  • [46] Meta-Analysis of Scale Reliability Using Latent Variable Modeling
    Raykov, Tenko
    Marcoulides, George A.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2013, 20 (02) : 338 - 353
  • [47] Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds for data integration
    Shim, Sung Ryul
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH, 2022, 44
  • [48] Modeling Cloud Forensics Readiness using Meta-Analysis Approach
    Kristyan, Samuel Andi
    Suhardi
    Juhana, Tutun
    2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION (ICITSI), 2020, : 364 - 369
  • [49] Analysis of categorical moderators in mixed-effects meta-analysis: Consequences of using pooled versus separate estimates of the residual between-studies variances
    Rubio-Aparicio, Maria
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    Antonio Lopez-Lopez, Jose
    Botella, Juan
    Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (03) : 439 - 456
  • [50] Nitrosative Stress Molecules in Multiple Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis
    Forster, Moritz
    Nelke, Christopher
    Rauber, Saskia
    Lassmann, Hans
    Ruck, Tobias
    Sormani, Maria Pia
    Signori, Alessio
    Hartung, Hans-Peter
    Kury, Patrick
    Meuth, Sven G.
    Kremer, David
    BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (12)