Using multiple group modeling to test moderators in meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Schoemann, Alexander M. [1 ]
机构
[1] East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
meta-analysis; structural equation model; multiple group model; random-effects model; mixed-effects model; HETEROGENEITY; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1002/jrsm.1200
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis is a popular and flexible analysis that can be fit in many modeling frameworks. Two methods of fitting meta-analyses that are growing in popularity are structural equation modeling (SEM) and multilevel modeling (MLM). By using SEM or MLM to fit a meta-analysis researchers have access to powerful techniques associated with SEM and MLM. This paper details how to use one such technique, multiple group analysis, to test categorical moderators in meta-analysis. In a multiple group meta-analysis a model is fit to each level of the moderator simultaneously. By constraining parameters across groups any model parameter can be tested for equality. Using multiple groups to test for moderators is especially relevant in random-effects meta-analysis where both the mean and the between studies variance of the effect size may be compared across groups. A simulation study and the analysis of a real data set are used to illustrate multiple group modeling with both SEM and MLM. Issues related to multiple group meta-analysis and future directions for research are discussed. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 401
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Meta-Analysis in Higher Education: An Illustrative Example Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling
    Denson, Nida
    Seltzer, Michael H.
    RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 52 (03) : 215 - 244
  • [32] Inference using an exact distribution of test statistic for random-effects meta-analysis
    Keisuke Hanada
    Tomoyuki Sugimoto
    Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2023, 75 : 281 - 302
  • [33] Meta-MultiSKAT: Multiple phenotype meta-analysis for region-based association test
    Dutta, Diptavo
    Taliun, Sarah A. Gagliano
    Weinstock, Joshua S.
    Zawistowski, Matthew
    Sidore, Carlo
    Fritsche, Lars G.
    Cucca, Francesco
    Schlessinger, David
    Abecasis, Goncalo R.
    Brummett, Chad M.
    Lee, Seunggeun
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 43 (07) : 800 - 814
  • [34] Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in neurosurgical practice
    Dubourg, Julie
    Berhouma, Moncef
    Cotton, Michael
    Messerer, Mahmoud
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2012, 33 (01)
  • [35] The power of the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta-analysis
    Jackson, Dan
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (15) : 2688 - 2699
  • [36] Trust and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Main Effects, Moderators, and Covariates
    De Jong, Bart A.
    Dirks, Kurt T.
    Gillespie, Nicole
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 101 (08) : 1134 - 1150
  • [37] Apples and oranges (and pears, oh my!): The search for moderators in meta-analysis
    Cortina, JM
    ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2003, 6 (04) : 415 - 439
  • [38] Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis
    Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (01) : 37 - 52
  • [39] A meta-analysis of leadership and intrinsic motivation: Examining relative importance and moderators
    Xue, Hanbing
    Luo, Yifei
    Luan, Yuxiang
    Wang, Nan
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [40] Exploring the Effectiveness and Moderators of Augmented Reality on Science Learning: a Meta-analysis
    Xu, Wen-Wen
    Su, Chien-Yuan
    Hu, Yue
    Chen, Cheng-Huan
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 31 (05) : 621 - 637