Using multiple group modeling to test moderators in meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Schoemann, Alexander M. [1 ]
机构
[1] East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
meta-analysis; structural equation model; multiple group model; random-effects model; mixed-effects model; HETEROGENEITY; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1002/jrsm.1200
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis is a popular and flexible analysis that can be fit in many modeling frameworks. Two methods of fitting meta-analyses that are growing in popularity are structural equation modeling (SEM) and multilevel modeling (MLM). By using SEM or MLM to fit a meta-analysis researchers have access to powerful techniques associated with SEM and MLM. This paper details how to use one such technique, multiple group analysis, to test categorical moderators in meta-analysis. In a multiple group meta-analysis a model is fit to each level of the moderator simultaneously. By constraining parameters across groups any model parameter can be tested for equality. Using multiple groups to test for moderators is especially relevant in random-effects meta-analysis where both the mean and the between studies variance of the effect size may be compared across groups. A simulation study and the analysis of a real data set are used to illustrate multiple group modeling with both SEM and MLM. Issues related to multiple group meta-analysis and future directions for research are discussed. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 401
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis
    Dennis, AR
    Wixom, BH
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2001, 18 (03) : 235 - 257
  • [2] Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies with Multiple Thresholds using Survival Methods
    Putter, H.
    Fiocco, M.
    Stijnen, T.
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 52 (01) : 95 - 110
  • [3] Testing Categorical Moderators in Mixed-Effects Meta-analysis in the Presence of Heteroscedasticity
    Rubio-Aparicio, Maria
    Antonio Lopez-Lopez, Jose
    Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
    Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio
    Botella, Juan
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2020, 88 (02) : 288 - 310
  • [4] Meta-CART: A tool to identify interactions between moderators in meta-analysis
    Li, Xinru
    Dusseldorp, Elise
    Meulman, Jacqueline J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (01) : 118 - 136
  • [5] Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis
    Frattaroli, Joanne.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2006, 132 (06) : 823 - 865
  • [6] A comparison of bootstrap approaches for homogeneity test based on dichotomous outcome in meta-analysis
    Lee, J. Y.
    Shen, P. S.
    Cheng, K. F.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2023, 52 (09) : 4218 - 4229
  • [7] Inference using an exact distribution of test statistic for random-effects meta-analysis
    Hanada, Keisuke
    Sugimoto, Tomoyuki
    ANNALS OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS, 2023, 75 (02) : 281 - 302
  • [8] Meta-analysis of test accuracy studies using imputation for partial reporting of multiple thresholds
    Ensor, J.
    Deeks, J. J.
    Martin, E. C.
    Riley, R. D.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2018, 9 (01) : 100 - 115
  • [9] The Antecedents and Moderators of Offline Information Search: A Meta-Analysis
    Maity, Moutusy
    Dass, Mayukh
    Malhotra, Naresh K.
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2014, 90 (02) : 233 - 254
  • [10] Retail crowding: meta-analysis of contextual and cultural moderators
    de Oliveira Santini, Fernando
    Ladeira, Wagner Junior
    Pinto, Diego Costa
    Herter, Marcia Maurer
    Mattila, Anna S.
    Perin, Marcelo Gattermann
    MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2022, 40 (01) : 57 - 71