What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision-making in healthcare consultations: A meta-synthesis of the literature

被引:142
作者
Edwards, Michelle [1 ]
Davies, Myfanwy [1 ]
Edwards, Adrian [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cardiff CF14 4XN, S Glam, Wales
关键词
Information exchange; External influences; Shared decision-making; Health literacy; Empowerment; PATIENT; COMMUNICATION; CHALLENGE; DOCTOR; MEDICINE; INTERNET; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.025
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To review the literature to identify external influences on information exchange and shared decision-making in healthcare consultations and conceptualise how information is used both Outside and within a consultation. Methods: A 'meta-study' approach (meta-data-analysis, meta-theory, meta-method, and meta-synthesis) was used to locate, review, synthesise and summarise the findings, methodology, theoretical orientation and interpretation of qualitative research papers. Results: in a model of external influences on information exchange within healthcare consultations, practitioner influences were: receptiveness to informed patients and patient choice, lack of knowledge of cultural difference, patient centredness vs. stereotyping. Patient influences were: motivation to seek and engage with information; the appraisal of information before a consultation, expression of cultural identity, and ways of managing the risk of poor information. Shared influences were: differing illness notions, role expectations and language. Empowerment, disempowerment and non-empowerment were outcomes of information exchange and health literacy was a mediator of external influences and empowerment. Conclusion: This meta-study provides a conceptualisation of external influences on information exchange in shared decision-making where health literacy mediates patient related influences and is also an influence on empowerment. Practice implications: Our model can inform the development of interventions aimed at improving information exchange and shared decision-making, potentially contributing to more equitable healthcare encounters. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 52
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], METASTUDY QUALITATIV
[2]  
Ashcroft R., 2001, EVIDENCE BASED PATIE, P53
[3]  
Boyatzis R. E., 1998, TRANSFORMING QUALITA
[4]   Informed decision making in outpatient practice - Time to get back to basics [J].
Braddock, CH ;
Edwards, KA ;
Hasenberg, NM ;
Laidley, TL ;
Levinson, W .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24) :2313-2320
[5]   Virtually he@lthy: The impact of Internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship [J].
Broom, A .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (03) :325-345
[6]   The significance for decision-making of information that is not exchanged by patients and health professionals during consultations [J].
Bugge, Carol ;
Entwistle, Vikki A. ;
Watt, Ian S. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (08) :2065-2078
[7]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[8]   Shared treatment decision making: What does it mean to physicians? [J].
Charles, CA ;
Whelan, T ;
Gafni, A ;
Willan, A ;
Farrell, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) :932-936
[9]  
Coulter A, 1997, J Health Serv Res Policy, V2, P112
[10]  
Coulter A., 2006, Patient-focused interventions: a review ofthe evidence