Immediate Effects of Simultaneous Application of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Ultrasound Phonophoresis on Active Myofascial Trigger Points A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:10
作者
Takla, Mary Kamal Nassif [1 ]
Rezk-Allah, Soheir Shethata [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Phys Therapy, Dept Basic Sci, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Myofascial Trigger Points; Combined Therapy; Phonophoresis; Ultrasound; PAIN; THERAPY; RELIABILITY; MECHANISMS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1097/PHM.0000000000000876
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of phonophoresis with combined therapy on active myofascial trigger points. Participants: One hundred participants with acute mechanical neck pain and at least one active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius were randomly assigned into four equal groups. Intervention: Groups consisted of diclofenac phonophoresis with combined therapy, diclofenac phonophoresis, ultrasound (US) with coupling gel, and sham US and applied for 10 mins over myofascial trigger points. Measurements: Measurements included pressure pain threshold and active cervical lateral flexion. Results: There were statistically significant improvements in postintervention pressure pain threshold and range of motion values in treatment groups (P < 0.0001). As for the sham US, no significant difference was found between the preintervention and postintervention values (P > 0.05). Bonferroni correction test revealed that there was a significant difference between all the four groups in pressure pain threshold values (P < 0.0001); however, it was nonsignificant (P > 0.05) for range of motion. Conclusions: Diclofenac phonophoresis with combined therapy, phonophoresis, and US were all effective in increasing pressure pain threshold values and range of motion. In addition, phonophoresis with combined therapy was shown to be superior over phonophoresis, and phonophoresis was superior over US in terms of reducing pain sensitivity. However, none of the treatment groups were found to be superior over the other in increasing range of motion.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 338
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] The effect of combined therapy (ultrasound and interferential current) on pain and sleep in fibromyalgia
    Almeida, TF
    Roizenblatt, S
    Benedito-Silva, AA
    Tufik, S
    [J]. PAIN, 2003, 104 (03) : 665 - 672
  • [2] Alvarez D.J., 2002, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V65, P1
  • [3] [Anonymous], PHYS MED REHABILITAT
  • [4] Avrahami R, 2015, WOUNDS, V27, P199
  • [5] Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome
    Ay, Saime
    Dogan, Sebnem Koldas
    Evcik, Deniz
    Baser, Ozgun Cakmak
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (09) : 1203 - 1208
  • [6] Low-intensity ultrasound induces angiogenesis in rat hind-limb ischemia
    Barzelai, S
    Sharabani-Yosef, O
    Holbova, R
    Castel, D
    Walden, R
    Engelberg, S
    Scheinowitz, M
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 32 (01) : 139 - 145
  • [7] Bodhale A, 2015, J MED THESIS, V3, P3
  • [8] Myofascial pain
    Borg-Stein, J
    Simons, DG
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 83 (03): : S40 - S47
  • [9] Bracciano A, 2008, THEORY APPL OCCUPATI, P127
  • [10] THE USE OF ULTRASOUND AS AN ENHANCER FOR TRANSCUTANEOUS DRUG-DELIVERY - PHONOPHORESIS
    BYL, NN
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 75 (06): : 539 - 553