Genetic parameters across lactation for feed intake, fat-and protein-corrected milk, and liveweight in first-parity Holstein cattle

被引:60
作者
Manzanilla, C. I. V. Pech [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Veerkamp, R. F. [1 ,2 ]
Calus, M. P. L. [1 ]
Zom, R. [4 ]
van Knegsel, A. [5 ]
Pryce, J. E., II [6 ]
De Haas, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen UR Livestock Res, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Natl Res Inst Forestry Agr & Livestock, Mococha Res Stn, Mococha 97454, Yucatan, Mexico
[4] Wageningen UR Livestock Res, Anim Nutr Grp, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
[5] Wageningen Univ, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[6] Dept Environm & Primary Ind Victoria, Biosci Res Div, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
关键词
feed intake; milk yield; liveweight; genetic correlation; random regression; BODY CONDITION SCORE; DRY-MATTER INTAKE; RANDOM REGRESSION-MODELS; NEGATIVE-ENERGY BALANCE; LINEAR TYPE TRAITS; DAIRY-CATTLE; LIVE WEIGHT; COVARIANCE FUNCTIONS; COWS; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2014-8165
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Breeding values for dry matter intake (DMI) are important to optimize dairy cattle breeding goals for feed efficiency. However, generally, only small data sets are available for feed intake, due to the cost and difficulty of measuring DMI, which makes understanding the genetic associations between traits across lactation difficult, let alone the possibility for selection of breeding animals. However, estimating national breeding values through cheaper and more easily measured correlated traits, such as milk yield and liveweight (LW), could be a first step to predict DMI. Combining DMI data across historical nutritional experiments might help to expand the data sets. Therefore, the objective was to estimate genetic parameters for DMI, fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM) yield, and LW across the entire first lactation using a relatively large data set combining experimental data across the Netherlands. A total of 30,483 weekly records for DMI, 49,977 for FPCM yield, and 31,956 for LW were available from 2,283 Dutch Holstein-Friesian first-parity cows between 1990 and 2011. Heritabilities, covariance components, and genetic correlations were estimated using a multivariate random regression model. The model included an effect for year-season of calving, and polynomials for age of cow at calving and days in milk (DIM). The random effects were experimental treatment, year-month of measurement, and the additive genetic, permanent environmental, and residual term. Additive genetic and permanent environmental effects were modeled using a third-order orthogonal polynomial. Estimated heritabilities ranged from 0.21 to 0.40 for DMI, from 0.20 to 0.43 for FPCM yield, and from 0.25 to 0.48 for LW across DIM. Genetic correlations between DMI at different DIM were relatively low during early and late lactation, compared with mid lactation. The genetic correlations between DMI and FPCM yield varied across DIM. This correlation was negative (up to -0.5) between FPCM yield in early lactation and DMI across the entire lactation, but highly positive (above 0.8) when both traits were in mid lactation. The correlation between DMI and LW was 0.6 during early lactation, but decreased to 0.4 during mid lactation. The highest correlations between FPCM yield and LW (0.3-0.5) were estimated during mid lactation. However, the genetic correlations between DMI and either FPCM yield or LW were not symmetric across DIM, and differed depending on which trait was measured first. The results of our study are useful to understand the genetic relationship of DMI; FPCM yield, and LW on specific days across lactation.
引用
收藏
页码:5851 / 5862
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Technical Report
  • [2] Merging and characterising phenotypic data on conventional and rare traits from dairy cattle experimental resources in three countries
    Banos, G.
    Coffey, M. P.
    Veerkamp, R. F.
    Berry, D. P.
    Wall, E.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2012, 6 (07) : 1040 - 1048
  • [3] International genetic evaluation of Holstein bulls for overall type traits and body condition score
    Battagin, M.
    Forabosco, F.
    Jakobsen, J. H.
    Penasa, M.
    Lawlor, T. J.
    Cassandro, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (08) : 4721 - 4731
  • [4] Effects of genotype by environment interactions on milk yield, energy balance, and protein balance
    Beerda, B.
    Ouweltjes, W.
    Sebek, L. B. J.
    Windig, J. J.
    Veerkamp, R. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 (01) : 219 - 228
  • [5] Genetics of grass dry matter intake, energy balance, and digestibility in grazing Irish dairy cows
    Berry, D. P.
    Horan, B.
    O'Donovan, M.
    Buckley, F.
    Kennedy, E.
    McEvoy, M.
    Dillon, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 (10) : 4835 - 4845
  • [6] CELL BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM: Genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle
    Berry, D. P.
    Crowley, J. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (04) : 1594 - 1613
  • [7] Short communication: Genetic relationships among daily energy balance, feed intake, body condition score, and fat to protein ratio of milk in dairy cows
    Buttchereit, N.
    Stamer, E.
    Junge, W.
    Thaller, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (03) : 1586 - 1591
  • [8] Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle
    Calus, M. P. L.
    de Haas, Y.
    Pszczola, M.
    Veerkamp, R. F.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2013, 7 (02) : 183 - 191
  • [9] Improved accuracy of genomic prediction for dry matter intake of dairy cattle from combined European and Australian data sets
    de Haas, Y.
    Calus, M. P. L.
    Veerkamp, R. F.
    Wall, E.
    Coffey, M. P.
    Daetwyler, H. D.
    Hayes, B. J.
    Pryce, J. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (10) : 6103 - 6112
  • [10] Computing approximate standard errors for genetic parameters derived from random regression models fitted by average information REML
    Fischer, TM
    Gilmour, AR
    van der Werf, JHJ
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2004, 36 (03) : 363 - 369