Investor Expertise as Mastery over Mind: Regulating Loss Affect for Superior Investment Performance

被引:9
作者
Chu, Wujin [1 ]
Im, Meeja [2 ]
Lee, Eun-Ju [3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul 151, South Korea
[2] Cyber Univ Korea, Seoul 110800, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
EMOTION REGULATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; GAMBLERS FALLACY; DISPOSITION; BEHAVIOR; MARKET; EXPERIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; REGRET; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/mar.20697
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
For most people, investing in stocks is a stressful experience, and this is particularly true in a loss situation. The emotional stress from a significant loss is quite likely to hamper effective decision making with respect to future investments. In three separate studies, with a combined sample of 60 professional investors and 154 lay investors, the authors compare differences in the magnitude of gain and loss affect felt by experts and lay investors as well as differences in affect regulation strategies employed. The findings demonstrate that professional investors are more effective than lay investors in coping with ups and downs of investing. In particular, professional investors show a lesser degree of gain and loss affect than lay investors with regard to both anticipated and experienced affect. Additionally, professional investors demonstrate a pronounced tendency to reappraise a loss situation as a positive learning experience, and to attribute failure in investment to themselves rather than blaming the market or blaming others. These types of affect regulation strategies result in a lower loss affect experienced by professional investors, which in turn leads to greater loss realization and better investment performance.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 334
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Stumbling on Happiness
[2]   The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? [J].
Ayton, P ;
Fischer, I .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (08) :1369-1378
[3]   Underlying cognitions in gambling behavior among university students [J].
Baboushkin, HR ;
Hardoon, KK ;
Derevensky, JL ;
Gupta, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 31 (07) :1409-1430
[4]   How effortful decisions get enacted: The motivating role of decision processes, desires, and anticipated emotions [J].
Bagozzi, R ;
Dholakia, UM ;
Basuroy, S .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 16 (04) :273-295
[5]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[6]  
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI
[7]  
Blair ME, 1996, PSYCHOL MARKET, V13, P445, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199608)13:5<445::AID-MAR1>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-P
[9]  
Browne M.W., 1993, SOCIOL METHOD RES, P445
[10]   Intensity bias in affective forecasting: The role of temporal focus [J].
Buehler, R ;
McFarland, C .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2001, 27 (11) :1480-1493