Five-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Matched-Pair Comparison Study

被引:203
作者
Seng, Chusheng [1 ]
Siddiqui, Mashfiqul A. [1 ]
Wong, Kenneth P. L. [1 ]
Zhang, Karen [1 ]
Yeo, William [1 ]
Tan, Seang Beng [1 ]
Yue, Wai-Mun [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Singapore 169608, Singapore
关键词
minimally invasive techniques; open; spinal fusion rates; clinical outcomes; 5; year; BACK MUSCLE INJURY; SPINE SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; PERFORMANCE; PRESSURE; DISEASE; CAGE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8212d
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Objective. To compare midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Summary of Background Data. Open TLIF is a proven technique to achieve fusion in symptomatic spinal deformities and instabilities. The possible advantages of MIS TLIF include reduced blood loss, less pain, and shorter hospitalization. To date, there is no published data comparing their midterm outcomes. Methods. From 2004-2007, 40 cases of open TLIF were matched paired with 40 cases of MIS TLIF for age, sex, body mass index, and the levels on which the spine was operated. Oswestry Disability Index, neurogenic symptom score, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and visual analogue scale scores for back and leg pain were obtained before surgery, 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery. Fusion rates were assessed using Bridwell classification. Results. Fluoroscopic time (MIS: 55.2 s, open: 16.4 s, P < 0.001) was longer in MIS cases. Operative time (MIS: 185 min, open: 166 min, P = 0.085) was not significantly longer in MIS cases. MIS had less blood loss (127 mL) versus open (405 mL, P < 0.001) procedures. Morphine use for MIS cases (8.5 mg) was less compared with open (24.2 mg, P = 0.006). Patients who underwent MIS (1.5 d) ambulated earlier than those who underwent open fusion (3 d, P < 0.001). Patients who underwent MIS (3.6 d) had shorter hospitalization than those who underwent open fusion (5.9 d, P < 0.001). Both groups showed significant improvement in Oswestry Disability Index, neurogenic symptom score, back and leg pain, SF-36 scores at 6 months until 5 years with no significant differences between them. Grade 1 fusion was achieved in 97.5% of both groups at 5 years. The overall complication rate was 20% for the open group and 15% for MIS group (P = 0.774), including 4 cases of adjacent segment disease for each group. Conclusion. MIS TLIF is comparable with open TLIF in terms of midterm clinical outcomes and fusion rates with the additional benefits of less initial postoperative pain, less blood loss, earlier rehabilitation, and shorter hospitalization.
引用
收藏
页码:2049 / 2055
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system - Two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial [J].
Brantigan, JW ;
Steffee, AD ;
Lewis, ML ;
Quinn, LM ;
Persenaire, JM .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1437-1446
[2]  
BRIDWELL KH, 1995, SPINE, V20, P1410, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199520120-00014
[3]   Comparison of low back fusion techniques: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches [J].
Cole C.D. ;
McCall T.D. ;
Schmidt M.H. ;
Dailey A.T. .
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2009, 2 (2) :118-126
[4]   Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium threaded cage device [J].
Elias, WJ ;
Simmons, NE ;
Kaptain, GJ ;
Chadduck, JB ;
Whitehill, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 93 (01) :45-52
[5]   Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery [J].
Gejo, R ;
Matsui, H ;
Kawaguchi, Y ;
Ishihara, H ;
Tsuji, H .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (10) :1023-1028
[6]   Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Perspective on Current Evidence and Clinical Knowledge [J].
Habib, Ali ;
Smith, Zachary A. ;
Lawton, Cort D. ;
Fessler, Richard G. .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2012, 2012
[7]  
Herkowitz, 1995, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V3, P123
[8]   Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery - A histologic and enzymatic analysis [J].
Kawaguchi, Y ;
Matsui, H ;
Tsuji, H .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (08) :941-944
[9]   Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery - Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery [J].
Kawaguchi, Y ;
Yabuki, S ;
Styf, J ;
Olmarker, K ;
Rydevik, B ;
Matsui, H ;
Tsuji, H .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (22) :2683-2688
[10]   The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion - History, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial [J].
Kuslich, SD ;
Ulstrom, CL ;
Griffith, SL ;
Ahern, JW ;
Dowdle, JD .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (11) :1267-1278