Introduction: Postimperial sovereignty games in the Nordic region

被引:15
作者
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca [1 ]
Gad, Ulrik P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Polit Sci, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Adv Secur Studies, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
关键词
Empire; sovereignty games; European integration; postcolonialism; Nordic region; WELFARE-STATE; IDENTITY; POLITICS; EMPIRE; EU; CONSTITUTION; NEUTRALITY; EUROPE; POST;
D O I
10.1177/0010836713514148
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Benevolence, homogeneity and peace has never been the full story of the Nordic region. Building on a critical review of myths of 'Norden' in international relations theory and beyond (international political economy, security studies, regional and European integration theory and postcolonialism), we develop the framework of postimperial sovereignty games for understanding contemporary Nordic foreign policy and regional dynamics. We shift focus from the 'large' Nordic countries to the remnants of Nordic empires: Iceland, Greenland, the Faroe Islands and angstrom land. On the one hand, these polities struggle to enhance their independence - Iceland even after becoming a sovereign state; the other polities via self-government arrangements. On the other hand, the former colonies develop close relationships to a supranational European Union in their effort to achieve independent subjectivity. Contrasting the developments towards increased independence and European integration, the article demonstrates the importance of imperial legacies. Firstly, it challenges Norden as a model security community. Secondly, it questions the image of a harmonious Nordic welfare model based on equality and consensus in light of the experiences of Iceland, Greenland, the Faroe Islands and angstrom land. Finally, it suggests that no theory of European integration is complete without taking imperial and postimperial processes into account.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 32
页数:30
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]   Playing the game of sovereign states: Charles Manning's constructivism avant-la-lettre [J].
Aalberts, Tanja E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2010, 16 (02) :247-268
[2]  
Aalberts TanjaE., 2004, INT J SEMIOTIC LAW, V17, P245
[3]   Autonomy development, irredentism and secessionism in a Nordic context [J].
Ackren, Maria ;
Lindstrom, Bjarne .
COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2012, 50 (04) :494-511
[4]   Late Sovereign Diplomacy [J].
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca .
HAGUE JOURNAL OF DIPLOMACY, 2009, 4 (02) :121-141
[5]  
Adler-Nissen Rebecca., 2013, European Integration and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games: The EU Overseas Countries and Territories
[6]  
Adler-Nissen Rebecca., 2008, Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond
[7]  
[Anonymous], ISA NEW ORL LOUIS FE
[8]  
[Anonymous], ARCTIC PROMISE LEGAL
[9]  
[Anonymous], UPPSALA MULTIETHNIC
[10]  
[Anonymous], UNION ITS OWN KIND R