Invited review: Beef-on-dairy-The generation of crossbred beef x dairy cattle

被引:93
作者
Berry, D. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Moorepk, Fermoy P61 P302, Cork, Ireland
关键词
beef x dairy; carcass; genetics; BODY CONDITION SCORE; GENETIC-MERIT HOLSTEIN; MEAT QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS; LINEAR TYPE TRAITS; CARCASS TRAITS; FEED-EFFICIENCY; BREEDING OBJECTIVES; MILK-YIELD; REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE; COVARIANCE COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2020-19519
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Because a growing proportion of the beef output in many countries originates from dairy herds, the most critical decisions about the genetic merit of most carcasses harvested are being made by dairy producers. Interest in the generation of more valuable calves from dairy females is intensifying, and the most likely vehicle is the use of appropriately selected beef bulls for mating to the dairy females. This is especially true given the growing potential to undertake more beef x dairy matings as herd metrics improve (e.g., reproductive performance) and technological advances are more widely adopted (e.g., sexed semen). Clear breed differences (among beef breeds but also compared with dairy breeds) exist for a whole plethora of performance traits, but considerable within-breed variability has also been demonstrated. Although such variability has implications for the choice of bull to mate to dairy females, the fact that dairy females themselves exhibit such genetic variability implies that "one size fits all" may not be appropriate for bull selection. Although differences in a whole series of key performance indicators have been documented between beef and beef-on-dairy animals, of particular note is the reported lower environmental hoofprint associated with beef-on-dairy production systems if the environmental overhead of the mature cow is attributed to the milk she eventually produces. Despite the known contribution of beef (i.e., both surplus calves and cull cows) to the overall gross output of most dairy herds globally, and the fact that each dairy female contributes half her genetic merit to her progeny, proxies for meat yield (i.e., veal or beef) are not directly considered in the vast majority of dairy cow breeding objectives. Breeding objectives to identify beef bulls suitable for dairy production systems are now being developed and validated, demonstrating the financial benefit of using such breeding objectives over and above a focus on dairy bulls or easy-calving, short-gestation beef bulls. When this approach is complemented by management-based decision-support tools, considerable potential exists to improve the profitability and sustainability of modern dairy production systems by exploiting beef-on-dairy breeding strategies using the most appropriate beef bulls.
引用
收藏
页码:3789 / 3819
页数:31
相关论文
共 143 条
[41]   Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls [J].
Crowley, J. J. ;
McGee, M. ;
Kenny, D. A. ;
Crews, D. H., Jr. ;
Evans, R. D. ;
Berry, D. P. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 88 (03) :885-894
[42]   Reducing Energy Demand: What Are the Practical Limits? [J].
Cullen, Jonathan M. ;
Allwood, Julian M. ;
Borgstein, Edward H. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (04) :1711-1718
[43]  
Cundiff, 2006, P BEEF IMPR FED ANN, P44
[44]   Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-Wide Approach [J].
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
Villanueva, Beatriz ;
Woolliams, John A. .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (10)
[45]   Use of crossbreeding with beef bulls in dairy herds: Effect on age, body weight, price, and market value of calves sold at livestock auctions [J].
Dal Zotto, R. ;
Penasa, M. ;
De Marchi, M. ;
Cassandro, M. ;
Lopez-Villalobos, N. ;
Bittante, G. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 87 (09) :3053-3059
[46]  
Davis Ruth Bonlokke, 2019, Interbull Bulletin, P94
[47]   Genomic prediction of dry matter intake in dairy cattle from an international data set consisting of research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia [J].
de Haas, Y. ;
Pryce, J. E. ;
Calus, M. P. L. ;
Wall, E. ;
Berry, D. P. ;
Lovendahl, P. ;
Krattenmacher, N. ;
Miglior, F. ;
Weigel, K. ;
Spurlock, D. ;
Macdonald, K. A. ;
Hulsegge, B. ;
Veerkamp, R. F. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (09) :6522-6534
[48]   Comparing environmental impacts of beef production systems: A review of life cycle assessments [J].
de Vries, M. ;
van Middelaar, C. E. ;
de Boer, I. J. M. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2015, 178 :279-288
[49]  
DelCurto T., 2017, P 2017 W ALF FOR S R, P87
[50]   Effect of dystocia on yield, fertility, and cow losses and an economic evaluation of dystocia scores for Holsteins [J].
Dematawewa, CMB ;
Berger, PJ .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1997, 80 (04) :754-761