Prevalence and diversity of management of prostate cancer patients classified as low risk using D'Amico group or Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score: A French multicenter study

被引:1
作者
Leon, P. [1 ,2 ]
Cancel-Tassin, G. [1 ,3 ]
Koutlidis, N. [4 ]
Calves, J. [5 ]
de la Vega, M. Funes [7 ]
Fournier, G. [3 ,5 ]
Valeri, A. [3 ,5 ]
Cormier, L. [3 ,4 ]
Larre, S. [2 ,3 ]
Cussenot, O. [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UPMC Univ Paris 06, Inst Univ Cancerol, GRC 5, Oncotype Uro, F-75020 Paris, France
[2] CHU Reims, Dept Chirurg Urol, Rue Cognacq Jay, F-51100 Reims, France
[3] CeRePP, F-75020 Paris, France
[4] CHU Dijon, Dept Chirurg Urol, F-21000 Dijon, France
[5] CHU Brest, Dept Chirurg Urol, F-29000 Brest, France
[6] UPMC Univ Paris 06, Hop Tenon, AP HP, Dept Chirurg Urol, F-75020 Paris, France
[7] CHU Dijon, Dept Pathol, F-21000 Dijon, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2017年 / 27卷 / 03期
关键词
Biopsies; Low risk; Management; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LOCALIZED LOW; ANTIGEN; TRENDS; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2017.01.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. - Currently, the French High Authority for Health does not recommend mass screening for prostate cancer (PCa), due to the risk of over-treatment, notably of low risk patients. Our study is intended to reflect the therapeutic attitudes for the management of patients classified as low risk of progression in French clinical centers. Methods. - For all positive prostate biopsies performed during 2012 and 2013 in five French departments of urology, clinicopathological characteristics required to calculate the d'Amico risk group and the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score were filled. Information on the first treatment of "low risk" patients was collected. Results. - A total of 1035 patients were included, with a median age at diagnosis of 66 years old. According to d'Amico and CAPRA classifications, 30.4% and 35.0% of patients were at low, 34.5% and 33.2% at intermediate, 35.1% and 31.8% at high risk. The diagnosis severity increased with age (P<0.0001). The main treatment for low risk patients was radical prostatectomy (41.6% and 42.0% for d'Amico and CAPRA, respectively), but active surveillance was the most frequent treatment if diagnosed after 75 years old. The management of low risk patients varied significantly between centers (P<0.0001), according to the therapeutic platforms available within the hospital. Conclusions. - In absence of strong progression predictor, the management of low risk PCa remains based on center habits and local therapeutic platforms. New predictive markers, such as multiparametric MRI or molecular tests, are needed to guide rational management of low risk PCa. Level of evidence. 4. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights. reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 165
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Fine, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (17) :2095-2101
[2]   Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study [J].
Bul, Meelan ;
Zhu, Xiaoye ;
Valdagni, Riccardo ;
Pickles, Tom ;
Kakehi, Yoshiyuki ;
Rannikko, Antti ;
Bjartell, Anders ;
van der Schoot, Deric K. ;
Cornel, Erik B. ;
Conti, Giario N. ;
Boeve, Egbert R. ;
Staerman, Frederic ;
Vis-Maters, Jenneke J. ;
Vergunst, Henk ;
Jaspars, Joris J. ;
Stroelin, Petra ;
van Muilekom, Erik ;
Schroder, Fritz H. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) :597-603
[3]   Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: Preliminary results [J].
Carter, HB ;
Walsh, PC ;
Landis, P ;
Epstein, JI .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) :1231-1234
[4]   Feasibility study: Watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression [J].
Choo, R ;
Klotz, L ;
Danjoux, C ;
Morton, GC ;
DeBoer, G ;
Szumacher, E ;
Fleshner, N ;
Bunting, P ;
Hruby, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) :1664-1669
[5]   High-risk prostate cancer in the United States, 1990-2007 [J].
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Cowan, Janet ;
Broering, Jeannette M. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 26 (03) :211-218
[6]   Cost Comparison Between Watchful Waiting With Active Surveillance and Active Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Corcoran, Anthony T. ;
Peele, Pamela B. ;
Benoit, Ronald M. .
UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (03) :703-707
[7]   Estimating the individual benefit of immediate treatment or active surveillance for prostate cancer after screen-detection in older (65+) men [J].
de Carvalho, Tiago M. ;
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. ;
de Koning, Harry J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 138 (10) :2522-2528
[8]   Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer-Report from a Consensus Panel [J].
de la Rosette, J. ;
Ahmed, H. ;
Barentsz, J. ;
Johansen, T. Bjerklund ;
Brausi, M. ;
Emberton, M. ;
Frauscher, F. ;
Greene, D. ;
Harisinghani, M. ;
Haustermans, K. ;
Heidenreich, A. ;
Kovacs, G. ;
Mason, M. ;
Montironi, R. ;
Mouraviev, V. ;
de Reijke, T. ;
Taneja, S. ;
Thuroff, S. ;
Tombal, B. ;
Trachtenberg, J. ;
Wijkstra, H. ;
Polascik, T. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (05) :775-780
[9]   A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Eggener, Scott E. ;
Mueller, Alex ;
Berglund, Ryan K. ;
Ayyathurai, Raj ;
Soloway, Cindy ;
Soloway, Mark S. ;
Abouassaly, Robert ;
Klein, Eric A. ;
Jones, Steven J. ;
Zappavigna, Chris ;
Goldenberg, Larry ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (01) :S19-S25
[10]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374