Immunohistochemical detection using the new rabbit monoclonal antibody SP1 of estrogen receptor in breast cancer is superior to mouse monoclonal antibody 1D5 in predicting survival

被引:156
作者
Cheang, Maggie C. U.
Treaba, Diana O.
Speers, Caroline H.
Olivotto, Ivo A.
Bajdik, Chris D.
Chia, Stephen K.
Goldstein, Lynn C.
Gelmon, Karen A.
Huntsman, David
Gilks, C. Blake
Nielsen, Torsten O.
Gown, Allen M.
机构
[1] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Genet Pathol Evaluat Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Prostate Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[4] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Breast Canc Outcomes Unit, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[5] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Populat Oncol Program, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[6] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Prevent Oncol Program, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[7] PhenoPath Labs, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.05.4155
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Estrogen receptor (ER) expression predicts improved breast cancer-specific survival and reduced risk of recurrence and is targeted in breast cancer therapy. A high-quality antibody to identify ER-positive patients plays an important role in clinical decision making for women with breast cancer. This study evaluates immunohistochemistry using two anti-ER antibodies, a new rabbit monoclonal antibody (SP1) and the mouse monoclonal antibody (1D5), in relation to biochemical ER assay results and clinical data on survival and adjuvant systemic therapy. Patients and Methods A population-based tissue microarray series of 4,150 invasive breast cancers was constructed. All patients had staging, pathology, treatment, and follow-up information. The median follow-up was 12.4 years and the median age at diagnosis 60 years. Survival analysis and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the prognostic value of ER status and correlations with clinical data. Results Among the 4,105 samples interpretable for both antibodies, SP1 detected ER positivity in 69.5% and 1D5 in 63.1% of cases. Both monoclonal antibodies are demonstrated to be good prognostic indictors for breast cancer-specific and relapse-free survival. In multivariate analysis, including age, tumor size, grade, and lymphovascular and nodal status, SP1 was a better independent prognostic factor than 1D5. Among patients with discrepant ER results, the 8% of patients who were SP1 positive/1D5 negative showed good outcomes, and the 2% SP1-negative/1D5 positive had poor outcomes. Maintaining the same 92% specificity and 98% positive predictive value, SP1 is 8% more sensitive than 1D5 using biochemical assay as gold standard. Conclusion SP1 represents an improved standard for ER immunohistochemistry assessment in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:5637 / 5644
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
  • [2] Bast RC, 1996, J CLIN ONCOL, V14, P2843
  • [3] Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer
    Berry, DA
    Cirrincione, C
    Henderson, IC
    Citron, ML
    Budman, DR
    Goldstein, LJ
    Martino, S
    Perez, EA
    Muss, HB
    Norton, L
    Hudis, C
    Winer, EP
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (14): : 1658 - 1667
  • [4] Bevitt DJ, 1997, J PATHOL, V183, P228
  • [5] Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays
    Camp, RL
    Chung, GG
    Rimm, DL
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2002, 8 (11) : 1323 - 1327
  • [6] Chernoff H, 1954, ANN MATH STAT, V25, P576
  • [7] Ten-year outcomes in a population-based cohort of node-negative, lymphatic, and vascular invasion-negative early breast cancers without adjuvant systemic therapies
    Chia, SK
    Speers, CH
    Bryce, CJ
    Hayes, MM
    Olivotto, IA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (09) : 1630 - 1637
  • [8] Clark GM, 1996, DIS BREAST, P461
  • [9] A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES
    COHEN, J
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [10] PARTIAL LIKELIHOOD
    COX, DR
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1975, 62 (02) : 269 - 276