Performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) in the prediction of hospital mortality in a mixed ICU in Singapore

被引:7
|
作者
Lew, Charles Chin Han [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Gabriel Jun Yung [2 ]
Tan, Chee Keat [3 ]
Miller, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Nutr & Dietet Dept, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Ng Teng Fong Gen Hosp, Dietet & Nutr Dept, 1 Jurong East St 21, Singapore 609606, Singapore
[3] Ng Teng Fong Gen Hosp, Dept Intens Care Med, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
APACHE II; critical care; mortality; prognosis; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; RISK PREDICTION; SAPS II; IV; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1177/2010105818812896
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) is used to quantify disease severity and hospital mortality risk in critically ill patients. It is widely used in intensive care units (ICUs) in Singapore, but its prognostic validity remains questionable as it has not been thoroughly assessed by established statistical methods. Objectives: This study aimed to: (a) evaluate the discrimination and calibration accuracy of the APACHE II in the prediction of hospital mortality in a mixed ICU, and (b) customise the APACHE II in an effort to maximise its prognostic performance. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted and all adult patients with >24 h of ICU admission in a tertiary care institution in Singapore were included. The outcome measure was hospital mortality, and all patients were followed-up until hospital discharge or death for up to one year after ICU admission. Results: There were 503 patients, and their mean (SD) age and APACHE II score were 61.2 (15.8) years and 24.5 (8.2), respectively. Hospital mortality was 31%, and no patients were lost to follow-up. The APACHE II has good discrimination (receiver operating characteristic: 0.76) but poor calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow C test: <0.001). Customisation did not significantly improve calibration accuracy. Conclusions: The APACHE II and its customised version should not be used in the local setting as they both have poor calibration. There is an urgent need for larger studies to perform second-level customisation or to develop a new prognostic model tailored to the Singapore critical care setting.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 152
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the performance of a modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scoring system for critically ill patients in emergency departments in Hong Kong
    Man, Shin Yan
    Chan, Ka Man
    Wong, Fung Yi
    Wong, Kit Yi
    Yim, Chi Lap
    Mak, Paulina S. K.
    Kam, Chak Wah
    Lau, Chor Chiu
    Lau, Fei Lung
    Graham, Colin A.
    Rainer, Timothy H.
    RESUSCITATION, 2007, 74 (02) : 259 - 265
  • [32] External validation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV in Dutch intensive care units and comparison with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II
    Brinkman, Sylvia
    Bakhshi-Raiez, Ferishta
    Abu-Hanna, Ameen
    de Jonge, Evert
    Bosman, Robert J.
    Peelen, Linda
    de Keizer, Nicolette F.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 26 (01) : 105.e11 - 105.e18
  • [33] External validation of a modified model of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II for orthotopic liver transplant patients
    Yaseen Arabi
    Adnan Abbasi
    Radoslaw Goraj
    Abdulmajeed Al-Abdulkareem
    Abudullah AL Shimemeri
    Munci Kalayoglu
    Kenneth Wood
    Critical Care, 6
  • [34] Prediction of the Evolution to Brain Death in the Neurocritical Patient: SPN Model Showed Better Performance Than Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II
    Godino, M.
    Tommasino, N.
    Mizraji, R.
    Carambula, A.
    Cacciatori, A.
    Leyes, L.
    Bengochea, M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 52 (04) : 1066 - 1069
  • [35] External validation of a modified model of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II for orthotopic liver transplant patients
    Arabi, Y
    Abbasi, A
    Goraj, R
    Al-Abdulkareem, A
    Al Shimemeri, A
    Kalayoglu, M
    Wood, K
    CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 6 (03): : 245 - 250
  • [36] USE OF DAILY ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY AND CHRONIC HEALTH EVALUATION (APACHE)-II SCORES TO PREDICT INDIVIDUAL PATIENT SURVIVAL RATE
    ROGERS, J
    FULLER, HD
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (09) : 1402 - 1405
  • [37] COMPARISON OF SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE (SOFA) AND ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY AND CHRONIC HEALTH EVALUATION II (APACHE II) AS PREDICTOR OF MORTALITY IN NON SURGERY LUNG DISEASES IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PERSAHABATAN HOSPITAL JAKARTA
    Winanti, S. E.
    Rogayah, R.
    Rasmin, M.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2011, 16 : 261 - 261
  • [38] The revised Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System (APACHE II) is more effective than the Glasgow Coma Scale for prediction of mortality in head-injured patients with systemic trauma
    Dalgic, Ali
    Ergungor, Fikret M.
    Becan, Tuerker
    Elhan, Atila
    Okay, Onder
    Yuksel, Buelent C.
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2009, 15 (05): : 453 - 458
  • [39] Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II for critically ill children?
    Sankar, Jhuma
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 19 (08) : 446 - 448
  • [40] Evaluation of the APACHE-II Score in Predicting Mortality in Patients Admitted to the ICU With Acute GI Bleeding
    DePalma, Fedele
    Henry, Patricia
    Elbaum, Philip
    Gerber, David
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S575 - S575