Performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) in the prediction of hospital mortality in a mixed ICU in Singapore

被引:7
|
作者
Lew, Charles Chin Han [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Gabriel Jun Yung [2 ]
Tan, Chee Keat [3 ]
Miller, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Nutr & Dietet Dept, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Ng Teng Fong Gen Hosp, Dietet & Nutr Dept, 1 Jurong East St 21, Singapore 609606, Singapore
[3] Ng Teng Fong Gen Hosp, Dept Intens Care Med, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
APACHE II; critical care; mortality; prognosis; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; RISK PREDICTION; SAPS II; IV; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1177/2010105818812896
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) is used to quantify disease severity and hospital mortality risk in critically ill patients. It is widely used in intensive care units (ICUs) in Singapore, but its prognostic validity remains questionable as it has not been thoroughly assessed by established statistical methods. Objectives: This study aimed to: (a) evaluate the discrimination and calibration accuracy of the APACHE II in the prediction of hospital mortality in a mixed ICU, and (b) customise the APACHE II in an effort to maximise its prognostic performance. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted and all adult patients with >24 h of ICU admission in a tertiary care institution in Singapore were included. The outcome measure was hospital mortality, and all patients were followed-up until hospital discharge or death for up to one year after ICU admission. Results: There were 503 patients, and their mean (SD) age and APACHE II score were 61.2 (15.8) years and 24.5 (8.2), respectively. Hospital mortality was 31%, and no patients were lost to follow-up. The APACHE II has good discrimination (receiver operating characteristic: 0.76) but poor calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow C test: <0.001). Customisation did not significantly improve calibration accuracy. Conclusions: The APACHE II and its customised version should not be used in the local setting as they both have poor calibration. There is an urgent need for larger studies to perform second-level customisation or to develop a new prognostic model tailored to the Singapore critical care setting.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 152
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Admission APACHE II for prediction of in-hospital mortality in acute pancreatitis
    Wu, Bechien U.
    Johannes, Richard S.
    Sun, Xiawu
    Banks, Peter A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 : S191 - S192
  • [12] The Ability Of Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (apache) Iv Score For Mortality Prediction In Patients Admitted To The Icu; A Single Center Study
    Choi, J.
    Park, Y.
    Kwon, I.
    Park, Y.
    Park, D.
    Park, M.
    Chung, C. -U. Chae-Uk
    Hwang, S.
    Jung, C.
    Park, H.
    Lee, J.
    Jung, S.
    Kim, J.
    Kim, S.
    Moon, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193
  • [13] Utility of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Pyogenic Liver Abscess: A Retrospective Study
    Lee, Yuan-Ti
    Wang, Chi-Chih
    Li, Chien-Feng
    Chen, Hsuan-Yi
    Liao, Hsien-Hua
    Lin, Chia-Chun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (12)
  • [14] Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) in a Greek general intensive care unit
    K Gkolfinopoulou
    G Kouvatseas
    A Armaganidis
    U Dafni
    Critical Care, 9 (Suppl 1):
  • [15] Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scoring systems in a single Greek intensive care unit
    Katsaragakis, S
    Papadimitropoulos, K
    Antonakis, P
    Strergiopoulos, S
    Konstadoulakis, MM
    Androulakis, G
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (02) : 426 - 432
  • [16] Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation IV to predict intensive care unit mortality
    Parajuli, Bashu Dev
    Shrestha, Gentle S.
    Pradhan, Bishwas
    Amatya, Roshana
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 19 (02) : 87 - 91
  • [17] MORTALITY PREDICTION MODELS IN INTENSIVE-CARE - ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY AND CHRONIC HEALTH EVALUATION-II AND MORTALITY PREDICTION MODEL COMPARED
    CASTELLA, X
    GILABERT, J
    TORNER, F
    TORRES, C
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (02) : 191 - 197
  • [18] Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score as a Predictor of Hospital Mortality in Patients of Coronavirus Disease 2019
    Zou, Xiaojing
    Li, Shusheng
    Fang, Minghao
    Hu, Ming
    Bian, Yi
    Ling, Jianmin
    Yu, Shanshan
    Jing, Liang
    Li, Donghui
    Huang, Jiao
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (08) : E657 - E665
  • [19] Comparing The Ability Of Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) And Pitt Bacteremia (PB) Scores To Predict Intensive Care Unit And Hospital Mortality Rates Of Bacteremic Cancer Patients
    Hawari, F. I.
    Al-Najjar, T. I.
    Al-Rimawi, D.
    Al-Fayumi, W.
    Zaru, L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 181
  • [20] Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score alone does not predict poor outcome due to fungal infections in ICU patients
    Taguchi, H
    Ikegami, K
    Sakai, T
    Yamada, K
    Hirose, K
    Sato, Y
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (12) : A199 - A199