Partnerships between Spanish social enterprises and nonprofits: A rich hybridity-based setting for social innovation

被引:14
作者
Sanzo-Perez, Maria Jose I. [1 ]
Alvarez-Gonzalez, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, Dept Adm Empresas, Avda Cristo S-N, Oviedo Asturias 33071, Spain
关键词
Social innovation; Social enterprises; Nonprofits; Partnerships; Hybridity; Impact; Sustainability; CROSS-SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS; VALUE CREATION; BUSINESS; CHALLENGES; MISSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102376
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Knowledge-based societies are boosting interconnectivity and interdependence, generating an environment characterized by the existence of multiple relationships in which the boundaries between the traditional sectors (for-profit, public, and nonprofit or third sector) are blurred, with 'hybridity' becoming a salient consequence. Our research focuses on one particular typology of a hybrid organization, the social enterprise, defined as a firm whose purpose is to achieve a social mission through the use of market mechanisms. The study attempts to analyze whether the development of partnerships between these companies and nonprofits encourages social innovations. Grounded on quantitative-based research with 200 Spanish social enterprises, the results confirm that the presence of social innovations in social enterprises is enhanced when there are also close partnerships embedded within the core goals and activities of the social enterprise. Moreover, insights point to the relevance of these partnerships in fostering the long-term sustainability and transformational impact of the innovation, therefore countervailing the short-term orientation of firms, and balancing the different institutional logics derived from the dual value focus of social enterprises (social versus economic value).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[31]   Social mission as competitive advantage: A configurational analysis of the strategic conditions of social entrepreneurship [J].
Munoz, Pablo ;
Kimmitt, Jonathan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 101 :854-861
[32]  
Murray R., 2010, The open book of social innovation
[33]   Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage [J].
Nahapiet, J ;
Ghoshal, S .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (02) :242-266
[34]  
Phills J. A., 2008, Stanford Social Innovation Review, V6, P34, DOI DOI 10.48558/GBJYGJ47
[35]   Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J].
Podsakoff, PM ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Lee, JY ;
Podsakoff, NP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :879-903
[36]   Cross-Sector Social Interactions and Systemic Change in Disaster Response: A Qualitative Study [J].
Quarshie, Anne M. ;
Leuschner, Rudolf .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 150 (02) :357-384
[37]   Stakeholders Matter: How Social Enterprises Address Mission Drift [J].
Ramus, Tommaso ;
Vaccaro, Antonino .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 143 (02) :307-322
[38]  
Rogers EverettM., 2003, Diffusion of Innovations, V5th ed
[39]   The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach [J].
Roundy, Philip T. ;
Bradshaw, Mike ;
Brockman, Beverly K. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2018, 86 :1-10
[40]  
Sabatier V, 2017, J MANAG DEV, V36, P48, DOI 10.1108/JMD-03-2015-0041