RELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS' REFLECTION LEVELS AND THEIR INQUIRY LEARNING OUTCOMES

被引:0
作者
Maeots, Mario [1 ]
Siiman, Leo [1 ]
Kori, Kulli [1 ]
Pedaste, Margus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
来源
EDULEARN16: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES | 2016年
关键词
inquiry-based learning; online learning environments; reflection; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY; DISCOVERY; ENVIRONMENT; KNOWLEDGE; QUALITY; SUPPORT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this study we aimed to identify the relation between students' reflection levels and their inquiry learning outcomes (i.e. their formulated conclusions) after conducting a complete inquiry cycle in an online Go-Lab Inquiry Learning Space (ILS). We expected that students exhibiting a higher reflection level would be more experienced in formulating higher quality conclusions than students at a lower reflection level. Forty-three students from the 9th grade with an average age of 15 years from two Estonian public schools participated in this study. During the interventions students worked with a chemistry-based ILS called "What does pH measure?" Students were given a pre-defined problem to be solved by following an inquiry cycle. In each phase students had tasks to perform which led to concrete learning outcomes. The students used specific application called Conclusion Tool to state their conclusions and used Reflection Tool to answer two open-ended reflective questions to reflect on their study process. The results suggest that students who reflect at a higher reflection level are more successful in formulating higher quality inquiry outcomes such as hypotheses, observations and conclusions. Therefore it seems that reflection should be part of the learning process in order to support students to achieve higher quality inquiry learning outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:5558 / 5564
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   THE ROLE OF ANOMALOUS DATA IN KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION - A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SCIENCE INSTRUCTION [J].
CHINN, CA ;
BREWER, WF .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 63 (01) :1-49
[2]  
de Jong T, 1998, REV EDUC RES, V68, P179, DOI 10.2307/1170753
[3]   Assessing the quality of reflection in student journals: a review of the research [J].
Dyment, Janet E. ;
O'Connell, Timothy S. .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 16 (01) :81-97
[4]   Encouraging Student Reflection and Articulation Using a Learning Companion: A Commentary [J].
Goodman B. ;
Linton F. ;
Gaimari R. .
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2016, 26 (01) :474-488
[5]  
Harlen W., 1997, DEV SCI PRIMARY CLAS
[6]   Comparing the effects of representational tools in collaborative and individual inquiry learning [J].
Kolloffel, Bas ;
Eysink, Tessa H. S. ;
de Jong, Ton .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2011, 6 (02) :223-251
[7]  
Kori K., 2014, ED RES REV, P1145
[8]   How to determine the quality of students' reflections? [J].
Leijen, Aeli ;
Valtna, Kai ;
Leijen, Djuddah A. J. ;
Pedaste, Margus .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (02) :203-217
[9]  
Mäeots M, 2014, J BALT SCI EDUC, V13, P19
[10]  
Maeots M., 2011, 11 IEEE INT C ADV LE