Fast optimization and dose calculation in scanned ion beam therapy

被引:7
作者
Hild, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Graeff, C. [5 ]
Trautmann, J. [5 ]
Kraemer, M. [5 ]
Zink, K. [4 ,6 ]
Durante, M. [5 ,7 ]
Bert, C. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] GSI Helmholtzzentrum Schwerionenforsch GmbH, Dept Biophys, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
[2] Univ Clin Erlangen, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[4] Univ Appl Sci, Inst Med Phys & Radiat Protect, D-35390 Giessen, Germany
[5] GSI Helmholtzzentrum Schwerionenforsch GmbH, Dept Biophys, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp Giessen Marburg, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiooncol, D-35043 Marburg, Germany
[7] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Fac Phys, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
particle therapy; prostate cancer; adaptive treatment planning; fast dose calculation; RADIOTHERAPY; SYSTEM; CT; DESIGN; TUMORS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1118/1.4881522
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Particle therapy (PT) has advantages over photon irradiation on static tumors. An increased biological effectiveness and active target conformal dose shaping are strong arguments for PT. However, the sensitivity to changes of internal geometry complicates the use of PT for moving organs. In case of interfractionally moving objects adaptive radiotherapy (ART) concepts known from intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can be adopted for PT treatments. One ART strategy is to optimize a new treatment plan based on daily image data directly before a radiation fraction is delivered [treatment replanning (TRP)]. Optimizing treatment plans for PT using a scanned beam is a time consuming problem especially for particles other than protons where the biological effective dose has to be calculated. For the purpose of TRP, fast optimization and fast dose calculation have been implemented into the GSI in-house treatment planning system (TPS) TRiP98. Methods: This work reports about the outcome of a code analysis that resulted in optimization of the calculation processes as well as implementation of routines supporting parallel execution of the code. To benchmark the new features, the calculation time for therapy treatment planning has been studied. Results: Compared to the original version of the TPS, calculation times for treatment planning (optimization and dose calculation) have been improved by a factor of 10 with code optimization. The parallelization of the TPS resulted in a speedup factor of 12 and 5.5 for the original version and the code optimized version, respectively. Hence the total speedup of the new implementation of the authors' TPS yielded speedup factors up to 55. Conclusions: The improved TPS is capable of completing treatment planning for ion beam therapy of a prostate irradiation considering organs at risk in this has been overseen in the review process. Also see below 6 min. (C) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An efficient dose calculation strategy for intensity modulated proton therapy
    Li, Yupeng
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Mohan, Radhe
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (04) : N71 - N84
  • [42] Towards analytic dose calculation for MR guided particle beam therapy
    Fuchs, H.
    Moser, P.
    Groeschl, M.
    Georg, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 : S43 - S43
  • [43] Technical Note: GATE-RTion: a GATE/Geant4 release for clinical applications in scanned ion beam therapy
    Grevillot, L.
    Boersma, D. J.
    Fuchs, H.
    Aitkenhead, A.
    Elia, A.
    Bolsa, M.
    Winterhalter, C.
    Vidal, M.
    Jan, S.
    Pietrzyk, U.
    Maigne, L.
    Sarrut, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (08) : 3675 - 3681
  • [44] Introduction to Ion Beam Therapy
    Martisikova, Maria
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS METHODS AND ACCELERATORS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2009, 1204 : 103 - 110
  • [45] GPU-based ultra-fast dose calculation using a finite size pencil beam model
    Gu, Xuejun
    Choi, Dongju
    Men, Chunhua
    Pan, Hubert
    Majumdar, Amitava
    Jiang, Steve B.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (20) : 6287 - 6297
  • [46] Fast calculation of nanodosimetric quantities in treatment planning of proton and ion therapy
    Ramos-Mendez, Jose
    Burigo, Lucas N.
    Schulte, Reinhard
    Chuang, Cynthia
    Faddegon, Bruce
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (23)
  • [47] On the Role of Ion-based Imaging Methods in Modern Ion Beam Therapy
    Magallanes, L.
    Brons, S.
    Marcelos, T.
    Takechi, M.
    Voss, B.
    Jaekel, O.
    Rinaldi, I.
    Parodi, K.
    XIII MEXICAN SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 1626 : 142 - 146
  • [48] Dosimetric validation of a GPU-based dose engine for a fast in silico patient-specific quality assurance program in light ion beam therapy
    Magro, Giuseppe
    Fassi, Martina
    Mirandola, Alfredo
    Rossi, Eleonora
    Molinelli, Silvia
    Russo, Stefania
    Bazani, Alessia
    Vai, Alessandro
    Ciocca, Mario
    Donetti, Marco
    Mairani, Andrea
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (12) : 7802 - 7814
  • [49] Experimental validation of a 4D dose calculation routine for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Pfeiler, Tina
    Baeumer, Christian
    Engwall, Erik
    Geismar, Dirk
    Spaan, Bernhard
    Timmermann, Beate
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2018, 28 (02): : 121 - 133
  • [50] Monte Carlo simulations to support start-up and treatment planning of scanned proton and carbon ion therapy at a synchrotron-based facility
    Parodi, K.
    Mairani, A.
    Brons, S.
    Hasch, B. G.
    Sommerer, F.
    Naumann, J.
    Jaekel, O.
    Haberer, T.
    Debus, J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (12) : 3759 - 3784