The Factors Affecting the Difficulty of Percutaneous Cylindrical Electrode Placement for Spinal Cord Stimulation

被引:8
|
作者
Kin, Kyohei [1 ]
Agari, Takashi [2 ]
Yasuhara, Takao [1 ]
Tomita, Yousuke [1 ]
Kuwahara, Ken [1 ]
Kin, Ittetsu [1 ]
Umakoshi, Michiari [1 ]
Morimoto, Jun [1 ]
Okazaki, Mihoko [1 ]
Sasaki, Tatsuya [1 ]
Date, Isao [1 ]
机构
[1] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Neurol Surg, Okayama, Japan
[2] Kurashiki Heisei Hosp, Dept Neurol Surg, Okayama, Japan
关键词
Cylindrical lead; Epidural adhesion; Neuromodulation; Percutaneous; Spinal cord stimulation; BACK SURGERY SYNDROME; CHRONIC PAIN; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ANGINA-PECTORIS; SCAR TISSUE; FOLLOW-UP; REPLACEMENT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.040
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Optimal placement of electrodes is important for spinal cord stimulation. Factors affecting the difficulty of percutaneous electrode placement are not well known. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the factors affecting the difficulty of percutaneous electrode placement. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 90 consecutive procedures of percutaneous cylindrical electrode implantation at the first author's institution. Age, sex, smoking state, body mass index, the duration of time from the beginning of pain syndrome to operation, diagnosis, the number of previous electrode placements, the previous electrode implantation period, the presence of axial low back pain, the electrode tip level, the pattern of electrode placement, and the reason for reimplantation were selected as factors associated with the success of electrode placement or the operation time of electrode placement. RESULTS: The number of previous electrode placements and the electrode tip level were independently associated with the operation time of electrode placement. According to both univariable and multivariable regression analyses, 1 previous electrode placement lengthened the operation time by approximately 15 minutes. No factors were significantly associated with the success of electrode placement. The more frequently that previous electrode placement was performed, the more difficult electrode placement tended to be. However, electrode reimplantation can be successful given extra time. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate factors affecting the difficulty of percutaneous electrode placement. A history of percutaneous cylindrical electrode placement did not affect the success of current placement, although it lengthened the operation time.
引用
收藏
页码:E391 / E398
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 10 kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Thoracic Pain: A Multicenter Case Series and a Guide for Optimal Anatomic Lead Placement
    Sayed, Dawood
    Foster, Jeffrey
    Nairizi, Ali
    Sills, Shawn
    Miller, Andrew
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2020, 23 (04) : E369 - E376
  • [32] Anatomical-related factors and outcome of percutaneous short-term spinal cord stimulation electrode shift in patients with disorders of consciousness: a retrospective study
    He, Qiheng
    Yang, Chaozhi
    Xu, Yangxi
    Niu, Hongchuan
    Wu, Haitao
    Huang, Haitao
    Chai, Xiaoke
    Cao, Tianqing
    Wang, Nan
    Wong, Peiling
    He, Jianghong
    Yang, Yi
    Zhao, Jizong
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 16
  • [33] Psychological Factors as Outcome Predictors for Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Bendinger, Tomasz
    Plunkett, Nick
    Poole, Debbie
    Turnbull, David
    NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (06): : 465 - 471
  • [34] The Incidence and Management of Postdural Puncture Headache in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Lead Placement for Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Simopoulos, Thomas T.
    Sharma, Sanjiv
    Aner, Musa
    Gill, Jatinder S.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2016, 19 (07): : 738 - 743
  • [35] Radiation Exposure in Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Mapping: A Preliminary Report
    Wininger, Kevin L.
    Deshpande, Kedar K.
    Deshpande, Keshav K.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2010, 13 (01) : 7 - 18
  • [36] Reoperation Rates and Risk Factors after Spinal Cord Stimulation Revision Surgery
    Kim, Samuel H.
    Lopez Ramos, Christian G.
    Palan, Mihir J.
    Kronquist, Elise
    Tan, Hao
    Elkholy, Mohamed Amgad Elsayed
    Raslan, Ahmed
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 103 (01) : 24 - 34
  • [37] Spinal Anesthesia and Minimal Invasive Laminotomy for Paddle Electrode Placement in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Technical Report and Clinical Results at Long-Term Followup
    Sarubbo, S.
    Latini, F.
    Tugnoli, V.
    Quatrale, R.
    Granieri, E.
    Cavallo, M. A.
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,
  • [38] Analyzing Spinal Cord Stimulation With Different Electrode Configurations: A Numerical Study
    Aydin, Elif Feyza
    Zengln, Reyhan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 41 (01)
  • [39] Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of spinal cord electrode stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain-State of art
    Neto, Joaquim Fechine de Alencar
    Oliveira, Rocymar Reboucas
    Dias, Artemio Jose Araruna
    Neto, Otavio da Cunha Ferreira
    de Lira, Ana Carolina Soares
    Bastos, Barbara Farias
    Rocha, Maria Lufsa
    Marques, Lufs Felipe Ferreira
    Queiroga, Pedro Henrique Maximo
    Lemos, Nilson Batista
    Neto, Fernando de Paiva Melo
    Lopes, Anderson Albert Primo
    Bem, Luiz Severo
    de Azevedo, Hildo Rocha Cirne
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30
  • [40] An Observational Study of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring as a Safety Mechanism in Placement of Percutaneous Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation and Spinal Cord Stimulation Systems
    Hagedorn, Jonathan M.
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Falowski, Steven M.
    Yadav, Abhishek
    Comer, Ashley
    Al-Asadi, Zayd
    Engle, Alyson M.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 13 : 3349 - 3353