Self-assessment of unilateral and bimodal cochlear implant experiences in daily life

被引：7

作者：

Devocht, Elke M. J. ^{[1
]}

Janssen, A. Miranda L. ^{[1
,2
]}

Chalupper, Josef ^{[3
]}

Stokroos, Robert J. ^{[1
,5
]}

Kingma, Herman ^{[4
]}

George, Erwin L. J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Maastricht Univ, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci MHENS, Dept ENT Audiol, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands

[2] Maastricht Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care CAPHRI, Dept Methodol & Stat, Maastricht, Netherlands

[3] Adv Bion European Res Ctr, Hannover, Germany

[4] Maastricht Univ, Sch Oncol & Develop Biol GROW, Dept ENT, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands

[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Brain Ctr Rudolf Magnus, Dept ENT, Utrecht, Netherlands

来源：

PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 12期

关键词：

QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CONTRALATERAL HEARING-AID; SPEECH RECOGNITION; RESIDUAL HEARING; ADULTS; BENEFITS; SCALE; USERS; STIMULATION; PERCEPTION;

D O I：

10.1371/journal.pone.0242871

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

Objective The subjective experiences were assessed of cochlear implant (CI) users either wearing or not wearing a hearing aid (HA) at the contralateral ear. Design Unilateral CI-recipients were asked to fill out a set of daily-life questionnaires on bimodal HA use, hearing disability, hearing handicap and general quality of life. Study sample Twenty-six CI-recipients who regularly use a contralateral HA (bimodal group) and twenty-two CI-recipients who do not use a HA in the contralateral ear (unilateral group). Results Comparisons between both groups (bimodal versus unilateral) showed no difference in self-rated disability, hearing handicap or general quality of life. However within the group of bimodal listeners, participants did report a benefit of bimodal hearing ability in various daily life listening situations. Conclusions Bimodal benefit in daily life can consistently be experienced and reported within the group of bimodal users.

引用

页数：21

共 68 条

[21] Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system [J].

Feeny, D ;

Furlong, W ;

Torrance, GW ;

Goldsmith, CH ;

Zhu, ZL ;

DePauw, S ;

Denton, M ;

Boyle, M .

MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (02) :113-128

[22]

Fielden Claire A, 2016, Cochlear Implants Int, V17 Suppl 1, P70, DOI 10.1080/14670100.2016.1153836

[23] Exploring the Factors Influencing Discontinued Hearing Aid Use in Patients With Unilateral Cochlear Implants [J].

Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M. ;

Leblanc, Stephanie .

TRENDS IN AMPLIFICATION, 2010, 14 (04) :199-210

[24] Users' experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid [J].

Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth Mary ;

Seguin, Christiane ;

Schramm, David ;

Chenier, Josee ;

Armstrong, Shelly .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 48 (04) :172-182

[25] The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) [J].

Gatehouse, S ;

Noble, W .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (02) :85-99

[26] Two-eared listening in dynamic situations [J].

Gatehouse, Stuart ;

Akeroyd, Michael .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2006, 45 :S120-S124

[27] Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: Word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing [J].

Gifford, Rene H. ;

Dorman, Michael F. ;

McKarns, Sharon ;

Spahr, Anthony J. .

JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2007, 50 (04) :835-843

[28] Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy [J].

Gifford, Rene H. ;

Dorman, Michael F. ;

Shallop, Jon K. ;

Sydlowski, Sarah A. .

EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (02) :186-194

[29] Missing Data Analysis: Making It Work in the Real World [J].

Graham, John W. .

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :549-576

[30] Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints [J].

Grutters, Janneke P. C. ;

Joore, Manuela A. ;

van der Horst, Frans ;

Verschuure, Hans ;

Dreschler, Wouter A. ;

Anteunis, Lucien J. C. .

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (08) :1439-1449

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →