Experimental and numerical investigations of water hammer analysis in pipeline with two different materials and their combined configuration

被引:19
作者
Garg, Rahul Kumar [1 ]
Kumar, Arun [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Roorkee, Dept Hydro & Renewable Energy, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India
关键词
Hydraulic transient; Water conductor system; Water hammer; Viscoelastic pipeline; Metallic pipeline; WALL VISCOELASTICITY; HYDRAULIC TRANSIENTS; STRATEGY; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104219
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Water conductor system in hydro power plants experience water hammer or hydraulic transient events regularly and may cause damage of civil and mechanical components. Recently developed viscoelastic pipes such as Glass Reinforced Fibre Plastic (GRP) have been started in use to replace metallic pipes in hydro power and water supply plants. However, studies on combinations of metallic-viscoelastic pipeline behaviour for water hammer conditions are limited especially for varied diameter and combinations of different pipe materials. In this paper, the response of water hammer pressure in metallic-viscoelastic pipeline is investigated experimentally and numerically. Two different pipe materials i.e. Mild Steel (MS) and GRP and their metallic-viscoelastic pipe configuration was used to investigate and analyze the water hammer pressure generation and compared with pressure developed in single material pipeline. An experimental setup was designed and fabricated to carry out the water hammer test. The numerical simulation was carried out by using the method of characteristics (MOC). The GRP pipeline was found more effective to reduce the water hammer pressure and a combination of GRP + MS pipeline (GRP for initial reach having low pressure and MS for later reach having high pressure) in the plants, where GRP pipeline alone cannot be used due to manufacturing limitations of pressure and size, can be used to reduce transient pressure in the water conductor system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Adamkowski A., 2015, HYDROPOWER DEV EUR
[2]   The influence of pipeline supports stiffness onto the water hammer run [J].
Adamkowski, Adam ;
Henclik, Slawomir ;
Janicki, Waldemar ;
Lewandowski, Mariusz .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS, 2017, 61 :297-303
[3]   Creep functions for transients in HDPE pipes [J].
Apollonio, C. ;
Covas, D. I. C. ;
de Marinis, G. ;
Leopardi, A. ;
Ramos, H. M. .
URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2014, 11 (02) :160-166
[4]   Water hammer with column separation: A historical review [J].
Bergant, A ;
Simpson, AR ;
Tijsseling, AS .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2006, 22 (02) :135-171
[5]  
Bonin C., 1960, ASME J. Eng. Power, V82, P111, DOI DOI 10.1115/1.3672721
[6]   Decay of pressure and energy dissipation in laminar transient flow [J].
Brunone, B ;
Ferrante, M ;
Cacciamani, M .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2004, 126 (06) :928-934
[7]  
Chaker M.A., 2020, J PRESS VESSEL TECHN
[8]   Investigating the branching redesign strategy for surge control in pressurized steel piping systems [J].
Chaker, Mohamed Amir ;
Triki, Ali .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING, 2020, 180
[9]  
Choon TW., 2012, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol, V2, P246, DOI [10.18517/ijaseit.2.3.196, DOI 10.18517/IJASEIT.2.3.196]
[10]   The dynamic effect of pipe-wall viscoelasticity in hydraulic transients. Part II - model development, calibration and verification [J].
Covas, D ;
Stoianov, I ;
Mano, JF ;
Ramos, H ;
Graham, N ;
Maksimovic, C .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (01) :56-70