共 35 条
Comparisons of Retear Patterns for 3 Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Methods
被引:35
作者:
Kim, Kyung Cheon
[1
]
Shin, Hyun Dae
[1
]
Cha, Soo Min
[1
]
Park, Jun Yeong
[1
]
机构:
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Taejon 301040, South Korea
关键词:
rotator cuff tear;
single-row technique;
suture-bridge technique;
retear;
SINGLE-ROW REPAIR;
SUTURE-BRIDGE TECHNIQUE;
INTEGRITY;
FIXATION;
FAILURE;
D O I:
10.1177/0363546514521577
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Only a few studies have reported an unusual retear pattern after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on the repair method. Purpose: To compare the retear pattern of the arthroscopic single-row technique (SRT), conventional suture-bridge technique (SBT), and knotless suture-bridge technique (K-SBT) for rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study evaluated 65 shoulders with retears revealed on magnetic resonance imaging at least 6 months after arthroscopic repair for a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. A retear was revealed in 21, 22, and 22 shoulders after the SRT, SBT, and K-SBT, respectively. Retears were classified as type 1 (unhealed tendons), type 2 (medially ruptured tendons with a healed footprint), or type 3 (unable to classify). Retear patterns were classified as full- or partial-thickness lesions; partial-thickness retears were further classified as articular- or bursal-side lesions. Results: A type 1 retear was observed in 71.4%, 40.9%, and 54.5% and a type 2 retear in 23.8%, 59.0%, and 40.9% of patients in the SRT, SBT, and K-SBT groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed among the 3 groups together (P = .195); however, a significant difference was observed between the SRT and SBT groups alone (P = .049). No significant differences were observed for either type 1 (P = .121) or type 2 (including both full- and partial-thickness) retears (P = .064) among the 3 groups together. When respective pairs of groups were compared, a significant difference was noted in both type 1 (P = .044) and type 2 retears (P = .019) between the SRT and SBT groups alone. No significant differences were observed in type 1 (P = .281) or type 2 full-thickness retears (P = .117) among the 3 groups together. When pairs of groups were compared, a significant difference in type 2 full-thickness retears was detected between the SRT and SBT groups alone (P = .037). Conclusion: The SBT has a different retear pattern than that of the SRT. However, the K-SBT retear pattern was not different from that of the SRT.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 565
页数:8
相关论文