Comparisons of Retear Patterns for 3 Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Methods

被引:35
作者
Kim, Kyung Cheon [1 ]
Shin, Hyun Dae [1 ]
Cha, Soo Min [1 ]
Park, Jun Yeong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Taejon 301040, South Korea
关键词
rotator cuff tear; single-row technique; suture-bridge technique; retear; SINGLE-ROW REPAIR; SUTURE-BRIDGE TECHNIQUE; INTEGRITY; FIXATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1177/0363546514521577
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Only a few studies have reported an unusual retear pattern after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on the repair method. Purpose: To compare the retear pattern of the arthroscopic single-row technique (SRT), conventional suture-bridge technique (SBT), and knotless suture-bridge technique (K-SBT) for rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study evaluated 65 shoulders with retears revealed on magnetic resonance imaging at least 6 months after arthroscopic repair for a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. A retear was revealed in 21, 22, and 22 shoulders after the SRT, SBT, and K-SBT, respectively. Retears were classified as type 1 (unhealed tendons), type 2 (medially ruptured tendons with a healed footprint), or type 3 (unable to classify). Retear patterns were classified as full- or partial-thickness lesions; partial-thickness retears were further classified as articular- or bursal-side lesions. Results: A type 1 retear was observed in 71.4%, 40.9%, and 54.5% and a type 2 retear in 23.8%, 59.0%, and 40.9% of patients in the SRT, SBT, and K-SBT groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed among the 3 groups together (P = .195); however, a significant difference was observed between the SRT and SBT groups alone (P = .049). No significant differences were observed for either type 1 (P = .121) or type 2 (including both full- and partial-thickness) retears (P = .064) among the 3 groups together. When respective pairs of groups were compared, a significant difference was noted in both type 1 (P = .044) and type 2 retears (P = .019) between the SRT and SBT groups alone. No significant differences were observed in type 1 (P = .281) or type 2 full-thickness retears (P = .117) among the 3 groups together. When pairs of groups were compared, a significant difference in type 2 full-thickness retears was detected between the SRT and SBT groups alone (P = .037). Conclusion: The SBT has a different retear pattern than that of the SRT. However, the K-SBT retear pattern was not different from that of the SRT.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 565
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Biomechanical performance of rotator cuff repairs with humeral rotation - A new rotator cuff repair failure model [J].
Ahmad, Christopher S. ;
Kleweno, Conor ;
Jacir, Alberto M. ;
Bell, Jonathon E. ;
Gardner, Thomas R. ;
Levine, William N. ;
Bigliani, Louis U. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (05) :888-892
[2]   Outcome and structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of fixation - Minimum 2-year follow-up [J].
Anderson, Kyle ;
Boothby, Michael ;
Aschenbrener, Daniel ;
van Holsbeeck, Marnix .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (12) :1899-1905
[3]   Biomechanical characteristics of single-row repair in comparison to double-row repair with consideration of the suture configuration and suture material [J].
Baums, M. H. ;
Buchhorn, G. H. ;
Spahn, G. ;
Poppendieck, B. ;
Schultz, W. ;
Klinger, H. -M. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2008, 16 (11) :1052-1060
[4]   Evaluation of residual rotator cuff defects after in vivo single- versus double-row rotator cuff repairs [J].
Brady, Paul C. ;
Arrigoni, Paolo ;
Burkhart, Stephen S. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (10) :1070-1075
[5]   Retear Patterns After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Single-Row Versus Suture Bridge Technique [J].
Cho, Nam Su ;
Yi, Jin Woong ;
Lee, Bong Gun ;
Rhee, Yong Girl .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (04) :664-671
[6]   High-Tension Double-Row Footprint Repair Compared with Reduced-Tension Single-Row Repair for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears [J].
Domb, Benjamin G. ;
Gloustrian, Ronald E. ;
Brooks, Adam ;
Hansen, Tmatthew ;
Lee, Tha Q. ;
ElAttrache, Neal S. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A :35-39
[7]   Which Method of Rotator Cuff Repair Leads to the Highest Rate of Structural Healing? A Systematic Review [J].
Duquin, Thomas R. ;
Buyea, Cathy ;
Bisson, Leslie J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (04) :835-841
[8]   Clinical and structural evaluation of arthroscopic double-row suture-bridge rotator cuff repair: early results of a novel technique [J].
El-Azab, H. ;
Buchmann, S. ;
Beitzel, K. ;
Waldt, S. ;
Imhoff, Andreas B. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2010, 18 (12) :1730-1737
[9]   Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair [J].
Frank, Joshua B. ;
ElAttrache, Neal S. ;
Dines, Joshua S. ;
Blackburn, Allie ;
Crues, John ;
Tibone, James E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (08) :1496-1503
[10]   The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears [J].
Galatz, LM ;
Ball, CM ;
Teefey, SA ;
Middleton, WD ;
Yamaguchi, K .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (02) :219-224