Vulnerability of the Great Barrier Reef to climate change and local pressures

被引:85
|
作者
Wolff, Nicholas H. [1 ,2 ]
Mumby, Peter J. [1 ,3 ]
Devlin, Michelle [4 ,5 ]
Anthony, Kenneth R. N. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Marine Spatial Ecol Lab, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Nature Conservancy, Global Sci, Brunswick, ME USA
[3] Univ Queensland, ARC Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[4] Ctr Environm Fisheries & Aquaculture Sci, Lowestoft Lab, Lowestoft, Suffolk, England
[5] James Cook Univ, Ctr Trop Water & Aquat Ecosyst Res, Catchment Reef Res Grp, Douglas, Qld, Australia
[6] Australian Inst Marine Sci, PMB3, Townsville, Qld, Australia
关键词
Acropora; bleaching; coral reefs; cumulative stressors; Paris climate accord; vulnerability; water quality; REGION-WIDE DECLINES; 1.5; DEGREES-C; CORAL-REEFS; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION; WATER-QUALITY; TERRESTRIAL RUNOFF; ACANTHASTER-PLANCI; TROPICAL CYCLONES; MANAGEMENT; OUTBREAKS;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.14043
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Australia's Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under pressure from a suite of stressors including cyclones, crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS), nutrients from river run-off and warming events that drive mass coral bleaching. Two key questions are: how vulnerable will the GBR be to future environmental scenarios, and to what extent can local management actions lower vulnerability in the face of climate change? To address these questions, we use a simple empirical and mechanistic coral model to explore six scenarios that represent plausible combinations of climate change projections (from four Representative Concentration Pathways, RCPs), cyclones and local stressors. Projections (2017-2050) indicate significant potential for coral recovery in the near-term, relative to current state, followed by climate-driven decline. Under a scenario of unmitigated emissions (RCP8.5) and business-as-usual management of local stressors, mean coral cover on the GBR is predicted to recover over the next decade and then rapidly decline to only 3% by year 2050. In contrast, a scenario of strong carbon mitigation (RCP2.6) and improved water quality, predicts significant coral recovery over the next two decades, followed by a relatively modest climate-driven decline that sustained coral cover above 26% by 2050. In an analysis of the impacts of cumulative stressors on coral cover relative to potential coral cover in the absence of such impacts, we found that GBR-wide reef performance will decline 27%-74% depending on the scenario. Up to 66% of performance loss is attributable to local stressors. The potential for management to reduce vulnerability, measured here as the mean number of years coral cover can be kept above 30%, is spatially variable. Management strategies that alleviate cumulative impacts have the potential to reduce the vulnerability of some midshelf reefs in the central GBR by 83%, but only if combined with strong mitigation of carbon emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:1978 / 1991
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An integrated risk assessment for climate change: analysing the vulnerability of sharks and rays on Australia's Great Barrier Reef
    Chin, Andrew
    Kyne, Peter M.
    Walker, Terence I.
    Mcauley, Rory B.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2010, 16 (07) : 1936 - 1953
  • [2] Connectivity and systemic resilience of the Great Barrier Reef
    Hock, Karlo
    Wolff, Nicholas H.
    Ortiz, Juan C.
    Condie, Scott A.
    Anthony, Kenneth R. N.
    Blackwell, Paul G.
    Mumby, Peter J.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2017, 15 (11)
  • [3] Spatial resilience of the Great Barrier Reef under cumulative disturbance impacts
    Mellin, Camille
    Matthews, Samuel
    Anthony, Kenneth R. N.
    Brown, Stuart C.
    Caley, M. Julian
    Johns, Kerryn A.
    Osborne, Kate
    Puotinen, Marjetta
    Thompson, Angus
    Wolff, Nicholas H.
    Fordham, Damien A.
    MacNeil, M. Aaron
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2019, 25 (07) : 2431 - 2445
  • [4] Future Scenarios as a Research Tool: Investigating Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation Options and Outcomes for the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    Evans, Louisa S.
    Hicks, Christina C.
    Fidelman, Pedro
    Tobin, Renae C.
    Perry, Allison L.
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2013, 41 (06) : 841 - 857
  • [5] Great Barrier Reef recovery through multiple interventions
    Condie, Scott A.
    Plaganyi, Eva E.
    Morello, Elisabetta B.
    Hock, Karlo
    Beeden, Roger
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (06) : 1356 - 1367
  • [6] Building resilience into practical conservation: identifying local management responses to global climate change in the southern Great Barrier Reef
    Maynard, J. A.
    Marshall, P. A.
    Johnson, J. E.
    Harman, S.
    CORAL REEFS, 2010, 29 (02) : 381 - 391
  • [7] Building resilience into practical conservation: identifying local management responses to global climate change in the southern Great Barrier Reef
    J. A. Maynard
    P. A. Marshall
    J. E. Johnson
    S. Harman
    Coral Reefs, 2010, 29 : 381 - 391
  • [8] Adaptation strategies for coral reef ecosystems in Small Island Developing States: Integrated modelling of local pressures and long-term climate changes
    Hafezi, M.
    Sahin, O.
    Stewart, R. A.
    Connolly, R. M.
    Mackey, B.
    Ware, D.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 253
  • [9] Future makers or future takers? A scenario analysis of climate change and the Great Barrier Reef
    Bohensky, Erin
    Butler, James R. A.
    Costanza, Robert
    Bohnet, Iris
    Delisle, Aurelie
    Fabricius, Katharina
    Gooch, Margaret
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    Lukacs, George
    Pert, Petina
    Wolanski, Eric
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (03): : 876 - 893
  • [10] Habitat maps to enhance monitoring and management of the Great Barrier Reef
    Roelfsema, Chris M.
    Kovacs, Eva M.
    Ortiz, Juan Carlos
    Callaghan, David P.
    Hock, Karlo
    Mongin, Mathieu
    Johansen, Kasper
    Mumby, Peter J.
    Wettle, Magnus
    Ronan, Mike
    Lundgren, Petra
    Kennedy, Emma, V
    Phinn, Stuart R.
    CORAL REEFS, 2020, 39 (04) : 1039 - 1054