Pterostilbene Reduced Post-antibiotic Effect Time of Linezolid against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

被引:3
作者
Basri, D. F. [1 ]
Hamid, N. A. [1 ]
Ishak, S. F. [1 ]
Ghazali, A. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Sch Diagnost & Appl Hlth Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
关键词
Pterostilbene; indifference; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; minimum inhibitory concentration; fractional inhibitory concentration; post-antibiotic effect; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; IN-VITRO; IDENTIFICATION; COMBINATIONS; INFECTIONS; VANCOMYCIN; GUIDELINES; THERAPY; STAY;
D O I
10.4172/pharmaceutical-sciences.1000179
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Pterostilbene is biologically classified as a phytoalexin, which is part of the plant's defence system in response to pathogen infection. The present study is to identify the type of interaction and post-antibiotic effect time of pterostilbene in combination with linezolid against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus American Type Culture Collection 43300 and 33591. The minimum inhibitory concentration values of individual antimicrobial agents were determined using microbroth dilution technique whereas the microdilution checkerboard assay was employed to verify the type of interaction of the combined agents from the fractional inhibitory concentration index values. The post-antibiotic effect time of pterostilbene and linezolid and in combination treatment was evaluated using viable plate count method. The minimum inhibitory concentration value of pterostilbene against both strains were the same (31.25 mu g/ml) compared to linezolid at 0.78 mu g/ml and 1.56 mu g/ml, against 43300 and 33591, respectively. Microdilution checker analysis of pterostilbene in combination with linezolid against both methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains displayed fractional inhibitory concentration value of 1.25. Despite the indifference interaction between pterostilbene and linezolid as shown by microdilution checker study, post-antibiotic effect analysis demonstrated antagonism as depicted by a decrease of post-antibiotic effect time of linezolid by pterostilbene against both methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains. The duration of post-antibiotic effect time obtained for pterostilbene were twice (3.6 +/- 0.15 h) that of linezolid (1.8 +/- 0.31 h) against methicillin-resistant S. aureus American type culture collection 43300. However, pterostilbene exhibited shorter post-antibiotic effect time of 0.3 +/- 0.10 h compared to linezolid (0.9 +/- 0.06 h) against 33591 strain. In conclusion, pterostilbene was not able to prolong the post-antibiotic effect duration of linezolid in both strains and each of the antimicrobials demonstrated a more favourable timing of doses when these agents were used singly.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 754
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prolongs intensive care unit stay in ventilator-associated pneumonia, despite initially appropriate antibiotic therapy
    Shorr, AF
    Combes, A
    Kollef, MH
    Chastre, J
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (03) : 700 - 706
  • [32] Synergy Testing by Etest, Microdilution Checkerboard, and Time-Kill Methods for Pan-Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
    Sopirala, Madhuri M.
    Mangino, Julie E.
    Gebreyes, Wondwossen A.
    Biller, Beth
    Bannerman, Tammy
    Balada-Llasat, Joan-Miquel
    Pancholi, Preeti
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2010, 54 (11) : 4678 - 4683
  • [33] Bacterial efflux pump inhibitors from natural sources
    Stavri, Michael
    Piddock, Laura J. V.
    Gibbons, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 59 (06) : 1247 - 1260
  • [34] Svahn K. Stefan, 2012, Infection Ecology & Epidemiology, V2, P11591, DOI 10.3402/iee.v2i0.11591
  • [35] In vitro antibacterial activity of combinations of fosfomycin, minocycline and polymyxin B on pan-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
    Zhang, Yajun
    Chen, Fengzhe
    Sun, Enhua
    Ma, Ruiping
    Qu, Chunmei
    Ma, Lixian
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2013, 5 (06) : 1737 - 1739