Patient-reported outcome measures in subarachnoid hemorrhage A systematic review

被引:16
作者
Nobels-Janssen, Edith [1 ,2 ]
van der Wees, Philip J. [2 ,3 ]
Verhagen, Wim I. M. [1 ]
Westert, Gert P. [3 ]
Bartels, Ronald H. M. A. [2 ]
Boogaarts, Jeroen D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Neurol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, IQ Hlth Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BRAIN-INJURY QOLIBRI; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; SCALE; COSMIN; INSTRUMENTS; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; EUROQOL; REGION;
D O I
10.1212/WNL.0000000000007618
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are aspects of a patient's health status and are considered important for stimulating patient-centered care. Current outcome measures in clinical care for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are insufficient to capture PROs. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the evidence regarding the quality of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in aSAH patients. Methods We performed a systematic review of the literature published from inception until October 29, 2018, in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE. Eligible studies had to evaluate measurement properties and capture PROs in aSAH patients. The quality of the studies and measurement properties were assessed using the consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018058566). Results We identified 9 articles that reported the assessment of 7 different disease-specific and generic PROMs used for aSAH patients, including 5 that focused on the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QoL). The methodologic quality of the validation processes used was generally doubtful. None of the PROMs complied with current standards for content validity. Conclusions Due to the low quality of evidence for the measurement properties, the evidence base for selecting a suitable PROM for use with aSAH patients is insufficient. Given the specific long-term consequences of aSAH, we consider a disease-specific PROM the most appropriate, with SS-QoL the most suitable PROM currently available.
引用
收藏
页码:1096 / 1112
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Appraising convergent validity of patient-reported outcome measures in systematic reviews: Constructing hypotheses and interpreting outcomes [J].
Abma I.L. ;
Rovers M. ;
Van Der Wees P.J. .
BMC Research Notes, 9 (1)
[2]   Cognitive and Functional Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage [J].
Al-Khindi, Timour ;
Macdonald, R. Loch ;
Schweizer, Tom A. .
STROKE, 2010, 41 (08) :E519-E536
[3]  
Andersen CR, 2018, NEUROCRIT CARE 0127
[4]   Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage [J].
Boosman, Hileen ;
Passier, Patricia E. C. A. ;
Visser-Meily, Johanna M. A. ;
Rinkel, Gabriel J. E. ;
Post, Marcel W. M. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 81 (05) :485-489
[5]   Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing [J].
Costa, Luciola da Cunha Menezes ;
Maher, Christopher G. ;
McAuley, James H. ;
Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (09) :934-943
[6]   Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends [J].
de Rooij, N. K. ;
Linn, F. H. H. ;
van der Plas, J. A. ;
Algra, A. ;
Rinkel, G. J. E. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 78 (12) :1365-1372
[7]   THE CLINICAL MEANING OF RANKIN HANDICAP GRADES AFTER STROKE [J].
DEHAAN, R ;
LIMBURG, M ;
BOSSUYT, P ;
VANDERMEULEN, J ;
AARONSON, N .
STROKE, 1995, 26 (11) :2027-2030
[8]   MULTIATTRIBUTE HEALTH-STATUS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS - HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX [J].
FEENY, D ;
FURLONG, W ;
BOYLE, M ;
TORRANCE, GW .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1995, 7 (06) :490-502
[9]   A comparison of preference assessment instruments used in a clinical trial: Responses to the visual analog scale from the EuroQol EQ-5D and the health utilities index [J].
Glick, HA ;
Polsky, D ;
Willke, RJ ;
Schulman, KA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 19 (03) :265-275
[10]  
Greenhalgh J., 2017, Health Serv Deliv Res, V5, DOI [DOI 10.3310/HSDR05020, 10.3310/hsdr05020]