Accurate segmentation of prostate cancer histomorphometric features using a weakly supervised convolutional neural network

被引:6
作者
Bukowy, John David [1 ]
Foss, Halle [2 ]
McGarry, Sean D. [3 ]
Lowman, Allison [2 ]
Hurrell, Sarah [2 ]
Ickzkowski, Kenneth A. [4 ,5 ]
Banerjee, Anjishnu [6 ]
Bobholz, Samuel A. [3 ]
Barrington, Alexander [2 ]
Dayton, Alex [7 ]
Unteriner, Jackson [2 ]
Jacobsohn, Kenneth [5 ]
See, William [5 ]
Nevalanian, Marja [4 ,8 ]
Nencka, Andrew [2 ]
Ethridge, Tyler [9 ]
Jarrard, David [9 ]
LaViolette, Peter [2 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Milwaukee Sch Engn, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Milwaukee, WI USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, 8700 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Biophys, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pathol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[5] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Urol Surg, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[6] Med Coll Wisconsin, Div Biostat, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[7] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Physiol, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[8] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[9] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Urol, Madison, WI USA
[10] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Biomed Engn, Madison, WI 53726 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; deep learning; machine learning; histology; epithelium; segmentation; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1117/1.JMI.7.5.057501
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Prostate cancer primarily arises from the glandular epithelium. Histomophometric techniques have been used to assess the glandular epithelium in automated detection and classification pipelines; however, they are often rigid in their implementation, and their performance suffers on large datasets where variation in staining, imaging, and preparation is difficult to control. The purpose of this study is to quantify performance of a pixelwise segmentation algorithm that was trained using different combinations of weak and strong stroma, epithelium, and lumen labels in a prostate histology dataset. Approach: We have combined weakly labeled datasets generated using simple morphometric techniques and high-quality labeled datasets from human observers in prostate biopsy cores to train a convolutional neural network for use in whole mount prostate labeling pipelines. With trained networks, we characterize pixelwise segmentation of stromal, epithelium, and lumen (SEL) regions on both biopsy core and whole-mount H&E-stained tissue. Results: We provide evidence that by simply training a deep learning algorithm on weakly labeled data generated from rigid morphometric methods, we can improve the robustness of classification over the morphometric methods used to train the classifier. Conclusions: We show that not only does our approach of combining weak and strong labels for training the CNN improve qualitative SEL labeling within tissue but also the deep learning generated labels are superior for cancer classification in a higher-order algorithm over the morphometrically derived labels it was trained on. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation
    Badrinarayanan, Vijay
    Kendall, Alex
    Cipolla, Roberto
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 39 (12) : 2481 - 2495
  • [2] Automated segmentation of epithelial tissue in prostatectomy slides using deep learning
    Bulten, Wouter
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
    van der Laak, Jeroen
    Litjens, Geert J. S.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: DIGITAL PATHOLOGY, 2018, 10581
  • [3] Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images
    Campanella, Gabriele
    Hanna, Matthew G.
    Geneslaw, Luke
    Miraflor, Allen
    Silva, Vitor Werneck Krauss
    Busam, Klaus J.
    Brogi, Edi
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Klimstra, David S.
    Fuchs, Thomas J.
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2019, 25 (08) : 1301 - +
  • [4] What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation?
    Csurka, Gabriela
    Larlus, Diane
    Perronnin, Florent
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH MACHINE VISION CONFERENCE 2013, 2013,
  • [5] Gleason grading: consensus and controversy
    Delahunt, Brett
    Srigley, John R.
    Lamb, David S.
    [J]. PATHOLOGY, 2009, 41 (07) : 613 - 614
  • [6] MEASURES OF THE AMOUNT OF ECOLOGIC ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SPECIES
    DICE, LR
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1945, 26 (03) : 297 - 302
  • [7] A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Egevad, Lars
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Parwani, Anil V.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Wiklund, Peter
    Han, Misop
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Klein, Eric A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 428 - 435
  • [8] An Update of the Gleason Grading System
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) : 433 - 440
  • [9] Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies
    Gertych, Arkadiusz
    Ing, Nathan
    Ma, Zhaoxuan
    Fuchs, Thomas J.
    Salman, Sadri
    Mohanty, Sambit
    Bhele, Sanica
    Velasquez-Vacca, Adriana
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Knudsen, Beatrice S.
    [J]. COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2015, 46 : 197 - 208
  • [10] GLEASON DONALD F., 1966, CANCER CHEMO THERAP REP, V50, P125