Long-term management of chronic pain with transdermal buprenorphine: A multicenter, open-label, follow-up study in patients from three short-term clinical trials

被引:42
|
作者
Likar, Rudolf
Kayser, Hubertus
Sittl, Reinhard
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Klagenfurt, Pain Clin, Klagenfurt, Austria
[2] Practice Anesthesiol & Special Pain Therapy, Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Pain Clin, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
buprenorphine; transdermal; cancer pain; chronic pain; long-acting opioid;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.06.012
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Transdermal buprenorphine is available in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain. It has been evaluated at doses of 35, 52.5, and 70 mu g/h for the management of moderate to severe chronic cancer and noncancer pain in 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, each of limited duration (similar to 14 days each). Long-term data are essential to determining the performance of an analgesic in the management of chronic pain. Objective: The purpose of this follow-up study was to obtain data on the efficacy and tolerability of longterm treatment with transdermal buprenorphine in cancer and noncancer patients with chronic persistent pain of moderate to severe intensity. Methods: This was an open-label, uncontrolled, follow-up study in patients from the 3 previous clinical trials who elected to continue treatment with transdermal buprenorphine 35 mu g/h and sublingual buprenorphine tablets (0.2 mg) as needed for breakthrough pain. The patch was to be changed every 72 hours throughout the patient's course of pain therapy. At visits every 2 weeks for the first 4 weeks and every 4 weeks for the remainder of study participation, patients evaluated their pain relief retrospectively on a 4-point verbal rating scale. They also rated the ease of patch handling using a 3-point verbal rating scale. Patterns of dose escalation and dose stability were monitored over time. Adherence to therapy was determined based on the number of patients who complied with the dosing schedule. Adverse events were documented by type, intensity, location (systemic or local), and relationship to study medication. Results: Two hundred thirty-nine patients were included in this follow-up study (120 women, 119 men; 100% white; mean [SD] age, 58 [11.3] years; mean weight, 70.8 [14.7] kg). One hundred thirty-four had cancer-related pain and 105 had pain of noncancerous origin. The mean duration of participation was 7.5 months, and 37 (15.5%) patients participated for > 12 months. Maximum study participation was 3.4 years in cancer patients and 5.7 years in noncancer patients. One hundred eighty-eight (78.7%) patients were considered adherent to therapy. The majority (65.9%) of patients managed their pain with the patch alone or took no more than 1 additional sublingual tablet daily for breakthrough pain. At least satisfactory pain relief was reported by 215 (90.0%) patients, and the buprenorphine patch was generally well tolerated. The most common systemic adverse drug reactions were nausea (9.2%), dizziness (4.6%), vomiting (4.2%), constipation (3.8%), and tiredness (2.9%), whereas the most common local adverse drug reactions were erythema (12.1%), pruritus (10.5%), and exanthema (8.8%). Conclusion: Transdermal buprenorphine was generally well tolerated and effective for the long-term treatment of chronic cancer or noncancer pain in these patients who had previously received buprenorphine in 3 short-term clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 952
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-Term Intrathecal Ziconotide for Chronic Pain: An Open-Label Study
    Webster, Lynn R.
    Fisher, Robert
    Charapata, Steven
    Wallace, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2009, 37 (03) : 363 - 372
  • [2] Effectiveness and tolerability of the buprenorphine transdermal system in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain:: A multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, prospective, observational clinical study
    Muriel, C
    Failde, I
    Micó, JA
    Neira, M
    Sánchez-Magro, I
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 27 (04) : 451 - 462
  • [3] A Feasibility Study of Transdermal Buprenorphine Versus Transdermal Fentanyl in the Long-Term Management of Persistent Non-Cancer Pain
    Mitra, Farzana
    Chowdhury, Shahead
    Shelley, Mike
    Williams, Gary
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [4] Reducing the use of opioids by patients with chronic pain: an effectiveness study with long-term follow-up
    Nicholas, Michael K.
    Asghari, Ali
    Sharpe, Louise
    Beeston, Lee
    Brooker, Charles
    Glare, Paul
    Martin, Rebecca
    Molloy, Allan
    Wrigley, Paul J.
    PAIN, 2020, 161 (03) : 509 - 519
  • [5] Chronic pain program management outcomes: Long-term follow-up for Veterans and civilians
    Hapidou, Eleni G.
    Pham, Eric
    Bartley, Kate
    Anthonypillai, Jennifer
    Altena, Sonya
    Patterson, Lisa
    Zacharias, Ramesh
    JOURNAL OF MILITARY VETERAN AND FAMILY HEALTH, 2021, 7 : 74 - 91
  • [6] Open-label study of the safety and effectiveness of long-term therapy with extended-release tramadol in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain
    Pascual, Maria Luz G.
    Fleming, Rosa Rosanna B.
    Gana, Theolphilus J.
    Vorsanger, Gary J.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2007, 23 (10) : 2531 - 2542
  • [7] A prospective long-term follow-up of dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the management of chronic intractable pain
    Eldabe, Sam
    Copley, Sue
    Gulve, Ashish
    Baranidharan, Ganesan
    Bretherton, Beatrice
    Kansal, Anu
    Madzinga, Grace
    Brookes, Morag
    Thomson, Simon
    Duarte, Rui, V
    PAIN, 2022, 163 (04) : 702 - 710
  • [8] BEHAVIORAL-MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN AND EXCESS DISABILITY - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF AN OUTPATIENT PROGRAM
    ROBERTS, AH
    STERNBACH, RA
    POLICH, J
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1993, 9 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [9] A prospective, open-label study of long-term intrathecal ziconotide for chronic nonmalignant back pain: A case report
    Ver Donck, A
    Dissanayake, S
    Bostyn, A
    Vercruysse, P
    NEUROMODULATION, 2006, 9 (01): : 68 - 71
  • [10] Pain in Guillain-Barre syndrome A long-term follow-up study
    Ruts, L.
    Drenthen, J.
    Jongen, J. L. M.
    Hop, W. C. J.
    Visser, G. H.
    Jacobs, B. C.
    van Doorn, P. A.
    NEUROLOGY, 2010, 75 (16) : 1439 - 1447