The impact of household connection to public network wastewater systems: regulatory impact assessment

被引:2
作者
de Carvalho, Bruno Eustaquio [1 ]
Costa, Samuel Alves Barbi [2 ]
Marques, Rui Cunha [1 ]
Netto, Oscar Cordeiro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, CERIS IST, Av Rovisco Pais, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Water & Wastewater Regulatory Agcy Minas Gerais A, Cidade Adm Ed Gerais,12 Andar, BR-31630901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Brasilia, Anexo SG-12, BR-70910900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
multiple criteria decision analysis; regulatory impact assessment; wastewater services; SERVICES; COST;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2019.102
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Brazil faces a severe lack of wastewater coverage. Even in urban areas, wastewater is directly disposed of in watercourses without any treatment for a large part of the population. Although the federal, state, and local governments have invested in water and wastewater services (WWS), the expected results have not been achieved. To overcome this problem, the present paper provides an opportunity to observe an ex-ante regulatory impact assessment (RIA) as a policy tool in Brazil. The regulatory policy options will be appraised through the multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) according to the following objectives: (i) protect the customers with respect to social aspects; (ii) safeguard the economic, operational and infrastructure sustainability; and (iii) protect the environment. The results show that by making decisions based on evidence, policy makers should reduce the households not connected to wastewater services by 75% and for that they should incur BRL 33 million to the year 2023. Hence, the extra revenues to be obtained with these new connections are capable of making a surplus estimated as BRL 42 million for the same period. This study promotes the use of RIA as a rational, robust and transparent decision framework by the regulatory agencies worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:1060 / 1070
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] ABAR, 2015, NAT ASS REG
  • [2] New development: Regulatory impact assessment in developing countries-tales from the road to good governance
    Adelle, Camilla
    Macrae, Donald
    Marusic, Andreja
    Naru, Faisal
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 (03) : 233 - 238
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, Multiple criteria decision analysis
  • [5] Berg SanfordV., 2013, Best Practices in Regulating State-owned and Municipal Water Utilities
  • [6] Carvalho B, 2017, WATER POLICY, V19, P423
  • [7] Chini CM, 2017, J WATER RESOUR PLANN, V143, P1
  • [8] Paths to universalize water and sewage services in Brazil: The role of regulatory authorities in promoting efficient service
    Costa Carvalho, Anne Emilia
    Bezerra Sampaio, Luciano Menezes
    [J]. UTILITIES POLICY, 2015, 34 : 1 - 10
  • [9] Public policy's bibliography: The use of research in US regulatory impact analyses
    Desmarais, Bruce A.
    Hird, John A.
    [J]. REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2014, 8 (04) : 497 - 510
  • [10] Dunlop C. A., 2016, The Handbook of Regulatory Impact Assessment, P3