Interviewing to develop Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures for clinical research: eliciting patients' experience

被引:112
作者
Bredart, Anne [1 ,2 ]
Marrel, Alexia [3 ]
Abetz-Webb, Linda [4 ]
Lasch, Kathy [5 ]
Acquadro, Catherine [6 ]
机构
[1] Inst Curie, Psychooncol Unit, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Inst Psychol, Psychopathol & Hlth Proc Lab EA 4057, F-75246 Paris, France
[3] Mapi, HEOR & Strateg Market Access, F-69003 Lyon, France
[4] Patient Ctr Outcomes Assessments, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
[5] Pharmerit Int, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[6] Mapi Res Trust, F-69003 Lyon, France
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Qualitative research; In-depth; Semi-structured; Structured interviews; Focus group; Cognitive interviews; Interpersonal; Communication skills; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; CONTENT VALIDITY; INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.1186/1477-7525-12-15
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures must provide evidence that their development followed a rigorous process for ensuring their content validity. To this end, the collection of data is performed through qualitative interviews that allow for the elicitation of in-depth spontaneous reports of the patients' experiences with their condition and/or its treatment. This paper provides a review of qualitative research applied to PRO measure development. A clear definition of what is a qualitative research interview is given as well as information about the form and content of qualitative interviews required for developing PRO measures. Particular attention is paid to the description of interviewing approaches (e. g., semi-structured and in-depth interviews, individual vs. focus group interviews). Information about how to get prepared for a qualitative interview is provided with the description of how to develop discussion guides for exploratory or cognitive interviews. Interviewing patients to obtain knowledge regarding their illness experience requires interpersonal and communication skills to facilitate patients' expression. Those skills are described in details, as well as the skills needed to facilitate focus groups and to interview children, adolescents and the elderly. Special attention is also given to quality assurance and interview training. The paper ends on ethical considerations since interviewing for the development of PROs is performed in a context of illness and vulnerability. Therefore, it is all the more important that, in addition to soliciting informed consent, respectful interactions be ensured throughout the interview process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
  • [3] [Anonymous], US BUREAU CENSUS RES
  • [4] [Anonymous], QUALITATIVE RES HLTH
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, FED REGISTER
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1997, ENTRETIEN RECHERCHE
  • [7] Ashworth P., 2008, Qualitative Psychology: A practical guide to research methods
  • [8] Barbour R., 1999, DEVELOPING FOCUS GRO
  • [9] Making sense of focus groups
    Barbour, RS
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 39 (07) : 742 - 750
  • [10] Patient-reported outcomes: Assessment and current perspectives of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the reflection paper of the European Medicines Agency
    Bottomley, Andrew
    Jones, Dave
    Claassens, Lily
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (03) : 347 - 353