Joint impact of competition, ownership form and economic regulation on airport performance and pricing

被引:78
作者
Adler, Nicole [1 ,2 ]
Liebert, Vanessa [3 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Jacobs Univ Bremen, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, D-28759 Bremen, Germany
关键词
Airport efficiency; Data envelopment analysis; Ownership form; Regulation; Competition; Pricing; EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTIVITY; PRIVATISATION; PRIVATIZATION; PRIVATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2014.03.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The combined impact of ownership form, economic regulation and competition on airport performance is analyzed using data envelopment analysis to measure cost efficiency in the first stage and regression analysis to measure the impact of the environment in the second stage. The empirical results of an analysis of European and Australian airports over a 10 year timeframe reveal that under relatively non-competitive conditions, public airports operate less cost efficiently than fully private airports. Irrespective of ownership form, regulation is necessary to emulate competitive forces thus pushing airport management towards cost efficiency and reasonable pricing policies. Under potential regional or hub competition, economic regulation inhibits airports of any ownership form from operating and pricing efficiently. Although public and fully private airports operate equally efficiently in a competitive setting, private airports still set higher aeronautical charges. Furthermore, mixed ownership forms with a majority public holding are neither cost efficient nor low price, irrespective of the level of competition. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 109
页数:18
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Aigner D., 1977, J. Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
[2]   Regulation, competition, and liberalization [J].
Armstrong, Mark ;
Sappington, David E. A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2006, 44 (02) :325-366
[3]  
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, 2010, AIRPORT MONITORING R
[4]  
AVERCH H, 1962, AM ECON REV, V52, P1052
[5]   Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis [J].
Banker, Rajiv D. ;
Natarajan, Ram .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 56 (01) :48-58
[6]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[7]   Performance evaluation of Italian airports: A data envelopment analysis [J].
Barros, Carlos Pestana ;
Dieke, Peter U. C. .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2007, 13 (04) :184-191
[8]   Airports in Argentina: Technical efficiency in the context of an economic crisis [J].
Barros, Carlos Pestana .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2008, 14 (06) :315-319
[9]  
Beesley M.M., 1999, REGULATING UTILITIES
[10]   Privatization, regulation and airport pricing: an empirical analysis for Europe [J].
Bel, Germa ;
Fageda, Xavier .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2010, 37 (02) :142-161