Exploring the sensitivity of speech-in-noise tests for noise-induced hearing loss

被引:25
作者
Jansen, Sofie [1 ]
Luts, Heleen [1 ]
Dejonckere, Philippe [1 ,2 ]
van Wieringen, Astrid [1 ]
Wouters, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Neurosci, ExpORL, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Fed Inst Occupat Dis, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Speech-in-noise; hearing screening; sensitivity; noise-induced hearing loss; DIGIT TRIPLET TEST; RECEPTION THRESHOLD; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; COGNITIVE-FACTORS; IMPAIRED HEARING; SCREENING-TESTS; LISTENERS; SENTENCES; PREVALENCE; TELEPHONE;
D O I
10.3109/14992027.2013.849361
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: Recently, the digit triplet test was shown to be a sensitive speech-in-noise test for early high-frequency hearing loss in noise-exposed workers. This study investigates if a further improvement is achieved when using a closed set of consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) speech items with the same vowel, and/or a low-pass (LP) filtered version of the standard speech-shaped noise. Design: Speech reception thresholds in noise were gathered for the digit triplet, CVC, and CVC_LP test and compared to the high-frequency pure-tone average (PTA). Study sample: 118 noise-exposed workers showing a wide range of high-frequency hearing losses. Results: For the 84 Dutch-speaking participants, the CVC test showed an increased measurement error and a decreased between-subject variation, leading to a weaker correlation with the PTA(2,3,4,6) (R = 0.64) and thus a lower sensitivity compared to the digit triplet test (R = 0.86). However, the use of LP-filtered noise resulted in a sensitivity improvement (R = 0.79 versus R = 0.64) due to the large increase in between-subject spread. Similar trends were found for the 34 French-speaking workers. Conclusions: Using CVC words with the same vowel could not increase the sensitivity to detect isolated high-frequency hearing loss. With LP-filtered noise, test sensitivity improved, but it did not surpass the original digit triplet test.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 205
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults [J].
Akeroyd, Michael A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 :S53-S71
[2]  
American National Standards Institute, 1997, S35 ANSI
[3]  
Bosman AJ, 1995, AUDIOLOGY, V34, P260
[4]   Guidelines on the diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss for medicolegal purposes [J].
Coles, RRA ;
Lutman, ME ;
Buffin, JT .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 25 (04) :264-273
[5]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN SPEECH RECOGNITION ABILITY - IMPLICATIONS FOR HEARING-AID SELECTION [J].
CRANDELL, CC .
EAR AND HEARING, 1991, 12 (06) :S100-S108
[6]   The viability of speech-in-noise audiometric screening using domestic audio equipment [J].
Culling, JF ;
Zhao, F ;
Stephens, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2005, 44 (12) :691-700
[7]  
Da Costa EA, 2001, AUDIOLOGY, V40, P123
[8]  
FOURNIER J E, 1950, Rev Otoneuroophtalmol, V22, P649
[9]   APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments [J].
Francart, Tom ;
van Wieringen, Astrid ;
Wouters, Jan .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2008, 172 (02) :283-293
[10]   Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners [J].
George, Erwin L. J. ;
Zekveld, Adriana A. ;
Kramer, Sophia E. ;
Goverts, S. Theo ;
Festen, Joost M. ;
Houtgast, Tammo .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 121 (04) :2362-2375