Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging

被引:106
作者
Dewey, Marc [1 ]
Teige, Florian [1 ]
Schnapauff, Dirk [1 ]
Laule, Michael [1 ]
Borges, Adrian C. [1 ]
Wernecke, Klaus-Dieter [1 ]
Schink, Tania [1 ]
Baumann, Gert [1 ]
Rutsch, Wolfgang [1 ]
Rogalla, Patrik [1 ]
Taupitz, Matthias [1 ]
Hamm, Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Radiol, Charite, Sch Med, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-145-6-200609190-00004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multislice computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the main candidates for noninvasive coronary angiography; however, multislice CT, unlike MRI, exposes patients to radiation and an iodinated intravenous contrast agent. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of multislice CT and MRI for noninvasive detection of clinically significant coronary stenoses (>= 50%). Design: Prospective intention-to-diagnose study. Setting: Single tertiary referral center, Berlin, Germany. Patients: 129 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Interventions: Multislice CT and MRI were both performed within a median of 1 day before conventional coronary angiography, which served as the reference standard. Measurements: Diagnostic performance of multislice CT and MRI. Results: 129 patients completed the study. Altogether, 108 patients with 430 vessels could be examined with both multislice CT and MRI and were used for analysis. In the per-patient analysis, the sensitivity of multislice CT (92% [95% CI, 82% to 96%]) was significantly higher than that of MRI (74% [CI, 61% to 83%]; P = 0.013). The sensitivity for detecting clinically significant stenoses was 82% for multislice CT and 54% for MRI (P < 0.001). Specificity and negative predictive value of multislice CT and MRI in the per-vessel analysis were 90% versus 87% (P = 0.73) and 95% versus 90% (P = 0.032), respectively. The effective radiation dose used with multislice CT (mean, 12.3 mSv [SD, 1.4]) in a consecutive subgroup of 73 patients was not significantly different from that used with diagnostic cardiac catheterization (11.4 mSv [SD, 4.8]) (P = 0.169). Most patients (74%) indicated that they would prefer multislice CT for future diagnostic imaging (P < 0.001). Limitations: This was a single-center study with 129 patients. Conclusions: In patients referred for conventional coronary angiography, multislice CT compares favorably with MRI for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 415
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ALTMAN D, 2000, STAT CONFIDENCE, P108
[2]  
ALTMAN D, 2000, STAT CONFIDENCE, P159
[3]  
Austen W G, 1975, Circulation, V51, P5
[4]  
BEGG CB, 1986, J CHRON DIS, V39, P575
[5]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (01) :40-44
[6]   Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :735-738
[7]   Evidence for use of coronary Stents - A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis [J].
Brophy, JM ;
Belisle, P ;
Joseph, L .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (10) :777-786
[8]  
Brunner E., 2002, NONPARAMETRIC ANAL L, P187
[9]   SAMPLE-SIZE FOR TESTING DIFFERENCES IN PROPORTIONS FOR THE PAIRED-SAMPLE DESIGN [J].
CONNOR, RJ .
BIOMETRICS, 1987, 43 (01) :207-211
[10]  
Cooper R, 2000, CIRCULATION, V102, P3137