The effect of the loading method and cross-head speed on resin-dentin microshear bond strength

被引:21
作者
Munoz, Miguel Angel [1 ,2 ]
Baggio, Rafael [1 ]
Emilio Mendes, Yasmine Bitencourt [1 ]
Gomes, Giovana Mongruel [1 ]
Luque-Martinez, Issis [1 ]
Loguercio, Alessandro D. [1 ]
Reis, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Ponta Grossa, Dept Restorat Dent, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Valparaiso, Fac Odontol, Catedra Operatoria Dent, Valparaiso, V Region, Chile
关键词
Adhesive; Microshear bond strength; Loading methods; Cross-head speed; SELF-ETCHING ADHESIVES; SURFACE-AREA; SHEAR; MICROTENSILE; SYSTEMS; ENAMEL; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.024
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This study compared the effect of different loading methods and crosshead speeds on resin-dentin microshear bond strength (mu SBS) using two etchandrinse adhesive systems. Sixty molar teeth had their dentin surfaces exposed and were randomly distributed into 12 groups (n=5), according to a combination of the factors: loading methods (orthodontic-looped wire and chisel systems), cross-head speed (0.5, 1.0 and 5.0 mm/min) and adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2 and XP Bond). Five tygon tubes were positioned over each sample, filled with composite resin and photoactivated. After 24 h, they were tested. The data were analyzed, with a two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (alpha=0.05). The mu SBS of the adhesives was higher with the chisel methods, compared to the orthodontic-looped wire (p<0.05). The cross-head speed was only significant for the chisel (p<0.05). The evaluated test variables affect the mu SBS for both adhesives and therefore should be standardized: however the loading method proved to have the most effect on mu SBS values. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 141
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   Influence of cross-head speed on resin-dentin shear bond strength [J].
Hara, AT ;
Pimenta, LAF ;
Rodrigues, AL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2001, 17 (02) :165-169
[12]  
International Standards Organization, 2003, 11405 ISOTS, V2nd
[13]   A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin-polymer interfaces [J].
McDonough, WG ;
Antonucci, JM ;
He, JM ;
Shimada, Y ;
Chiang, MYM ;
Schumacher, GE ;
Schultheisz, CR .
BIOMATERIALS, 2002, 23 (17) :3603-3608
[14]  
Mondragon E, 2001, J Adhes Dent, V3, P227
[15]  
Pashley D H, 1999, J Adhes Dent, V1, P299
[16]   The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test [J].
Phrukkanon, S ;
Burrow, MF ;
Tyas, MJ .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1998, 14 (03) :212-221
[17]   Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: A finite element stress analysis [J].
Placido, Eliane ;
Meira, Josete B. C. ;
Lirna, Raul Gonzdlez ;
Muench, Antonio ;
de Souza, Roberto Martins ;
Ballester, Rafael Yaque .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2007, 23 (09) :1086-1092
[18]  
Ritter A V, 2000, J Esthet Dent, V12, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00205.x
[19]   The influence of the cutting speed on bond strength and integrity of microtensile specimens [J].
Sadek, FT ;
Cury, AH ;
Monticelli, F ;
Ferrari, M ;
Cardoso, PEC .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2005, 21 (12) :1144-1149
[20]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SURFACE-AREA FOR ADHESION AND TENSILE BOND STRENGTH - EVALUATION OF A MICRO-TENSILE BOND TEST [J].
SANO, H ;
SHONO, T ;
SONODA, H ;
TAKATSU, T ;
CIUCCHI, B ;
CARVALHO, R ;
PASHLEY, DH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1994, 10 (04) :236-240