Intramuscular pressure of the multifidus muscle and low-back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of mini-open and conventional approaches

被引:16
作者
Mukai, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Takenaka, Shota [1 ]
Hosono, Noboru [1 ]
Miwa, Toshitada [2 ]
Fuji, Takeshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Kosei Nenkin Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Fukushima, Osaka, Japan
[2] Kansai Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
prospective randomized study; minimally invasive surgery; paraspinal splitting approach; Wiltse approach; pedicle screw; lumbar; SPINE SURGERY; HISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSES; EXTERNAL COMPRESSION; PARASPINAL MUSCLES; BLOOD-FLOW; INJURY; RETRACTION; EXERCISE; HUMANS; LEG;
D O I
10.3171/2013.8.SPINE13183
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. This randomized study was designed to elucidate the time course of the perioperative development of intramuscular multifidus muscle pressure after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and to investigate whether the route of pedicle screw insertion affects this pressure and resultant low-back pain. Although several studies have focused on intramuscular pressure associated with posterior lumbar surgery, those studies examined intramuscular pressure generated by the muscle retractors during surgery. No study has investigated the intramuscular pressure after PLIF. Methods. Forty patients with L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis were randomly assigned to undergo either the mini-open PLIF procedure with pedicle screw insertion between the multifidus and longissimus muscles (n = 20) or the conventional PLIF procedure via a midline approach only (n = 20). Intramuscular pressure was measured 5 times (at 30 minutes and at 6,12,24, and 48 hours after surgery) with an intraoperatively installed sensor. Concurrently, the FACES Pain Rating Scale score for low-back pain and the total dose of postoperative analgesics were recorded. Results. With the patients in the supine position, for both groups the mean pressure values were consistently 40-50 mm Hg, which exceeded the critical capillary pressure of the muscle. With the patients in the lateral decubitus position, the pressure decreased over time (from 14 to 9 mm Hg in the mini-open group and from 20 to 10 mm Hg in the conventional group). Among patients in the mini-open group, the pressure was lower, but the difference was not statistically significant. Postoperative pain and postoperative analgesic dosages were also lower. Conclusions. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate postoperative intramuscular pressure after PLIF. Although the results did not demonstrate a significant difference in the intramuscular pressure between the 2 types of PLIF, mini-open PLIF was associated with less pain after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 657
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Surgeon and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Bindal, Rajesh K.
    Glaze, Sharon
    Ognoskie, Meghann
    Tunner, Van
    Malone, Robert
    Ghosh, Subrata
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (06) : 570 - 573
  • [2] Boden SD, 1995, SPINE, V20, pS166
  • [3] A CARBON-FIBER IMPLANT TO AID INTERBODY LUMBAR FUSION - 2-YEAR CLINICAL-RESULTS IN THE 1ST 26 PATIENTS
    BRANTIGAN, JW
    STEFFEE, AD
    [J]. SPINE, 1993, 18 (14) : 2106 - 2117
  • [4] Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system - Two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial
    Brantigan, JW
    Steffee, AD
    Lewis, ML
    Quinn, LM
    Persenaire, JM
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) : 1437 - 1446
  • [6] Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: Is there a relationship to muscle retraction?
    Datta, G
    Gnanalingham, KK
    Peterson, D
    Mendoza, N
    O'Neill, K
    Van Dellen, J
    McGregor, A
    Hughes, SPF
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 54 (06) : 1413 - 1420
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes
    Karikari, Isaac O.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    [J]. SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S294 - S301
  • [8] BACK MUSCLE INJURY AFTER POSTERIOR LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY .1. HISTOLOGIC AND HISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSES IN RATS
    KAWAGUCHI, Y
    MATSUI, H
    TSUJI, H
    [J]. SPINE, 1994, 19 (22) : 2590 - 2597
  • [9] BACK MUSCLE INJURY AFTER POSTERIOR LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY .2. HISTOLOGIC AND HISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSES IN HUMANS
    KAWAGUCHI, Y
    MATSUI, H
    TSUJI, H
    [J]. SPINE, 1994, 19 (22) : 2598 - 2602
  • [10] Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery - Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery
    Kawaguchi, Y
    Yabuki, S
    Styf, J
    Olmarker, K
    Rydevik, B
    Matsui, H
    Tsuji, H
    [J]. SPINE, 1996, 21 (22) : 2683 - 2688