Effects of iconicity on requesting with the Picture Exchange Communication System in children with autism spectrum disorder

被引:34
作者
Angermeier, Katie
Schlosser, Ralf W. [1 ]
Luiselli, James K.
Harrington, Caroline
Carter, Beth [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Augmentative and alternative communication; Autism spectrum disorders; Iconicity; Picture Exchange Communication System; Requesting; Symbol selection;
D O I
10.1016/j.rasd.2007.09.004
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Research on graphic symbol learning suggests that symbols with a greater visual resemblance to their referents (greater iconicity) are more easily learned. The iconicity hypothesis has not yet been explored within the intervention protocol of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS). Within the PECS protocol, participants do not point to a symbol but exchange the symbol for an object. The purpose of this study was to examine whether children learn to request more readily with PECS when the symbols involved are highly iconic versus symbols that are low in iconicity. An adapted alternating treatments design combined with a multiple baseline design across subjects was used to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of symbol learning under two conditions: high iconicity and low iconicity. Four students with A autism or pervasive developmental disorders between the ages of six and nine years participated. Results indicated that students learned to request desired objects under both conditions, lending further support for the effectiveness of PECS. There was little to no difference, however, in the effectiveness and efficiency of requesting between the two conditions during Phases I and II of PECS training. Thus learners do not benefit A from symbols that bear more resemblance with their referents during the first two phases of PECS instruction. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 446
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, AUTISM MED ED ASPECT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, FOCUS AUTISM OTHER D
[3]  
Beukelman D.R., 2005, Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs
[4]   THE COMPARATIVE TRANSLUCENCY OF INITIAL LEXICAL ITEMS REPRESENTED IN 5 GRAPHIC SYMBOL SYSTEMS AND SETS [J].
BLOOMBERG, K ;
KARLAN, GR ;
LLOYD, LL .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1990, 33 (04) :717-725
[5]   The picture exchange communication system [J].
Bondy, A ;
Frost, L .
BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 2001, 25 (05) :725-744
[6]  
Frost L., 1994, The Picture Exchange Communication System training manual
[7]  
Fuller D.R., 1997, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, V13, P30, DOI DOI 10.1080/07434619712331277818
[8]   Effects on communicative requesting and speech development of the picture exchange communication system in children with characteristics of autism [J].
Ganz, JB ;
Simpson, RL .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2004, 34 (04) :395-409
[9]   NONVOCAL LANGUAGE-ACQUISITION IN ADOLESCENTS WITH SEVERE PHYSICAL-DISABILITIES - BLISSYMBOL VERSUS ICONIC STIMULUS FORMATS [J].
HURLBUT, BI ;
IWATA, BA ;
GREEN, JD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1982, 15 (02) :241-258
[10]   Comparison of graphic symbol learning in individuals with aphasia and right hemisphere brain damage [J].
Koul, RK ;
Lloyd, LL .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 62 (03) :398-421