Right Parasternal Electrode Configuration Converts a Failed Electrocardiographic Screening to a Pass for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation

被引:8
作者
Chan, N. Y. [1 ]
Yuen, H. C. [1 ]
Mok, N. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Med & Geriatr, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Screening; Sudden cardiac death; Right parasternal; Subcutaneous electrocardiography;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2015.07.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Pre-operative electrocardiographic (ECG) screening before subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (SICD) implantation is essential to prevent T-wave oversensing and inappropriate shocks. The failure rate of ECG screening was reported to be up to 8% when only two body positions were tested. Method Three subcutaneous ECG vectors represented by lead I, II and III were obtained in standing, supine, sitting and squatting positions. A patient qualified if the ECG in any same lead passed in all four positions. We report a 31-year-old man with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation who failed ECG screening for SICD implantation with the conventional left parasternal electrode (LPS) configuration in all three subcutaneous ECG vectors. Right parasternal electrode (RPS) configuration with left arm and right arm ECG electrodes positioned 1 cm lateral to right sternal border was attempted for screening. Result The amplitude of the QRS complex was significantly larger in the RPS compared to the LPS configuration in lead III and the patient passed the ECG screening in four body positions. He underwent successful SICD implantation with RPS approach with appropriate sensing both during the procedure and exercise treadmill test four weeks later. Ventricular fibrillation was successfully converted with 65J standard polarity shock during the procedure and no ICD shock was experienced by the patient on six-month follow-up. Conclusion RPS configuration may be considered in patients who fail the ECG screening with the conventional LPS approach for SICD implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:E203 / E205
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   An Entirely Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator [J].
Bardy, Gust H. ;
Smith, Warren M. ;
Hood, Margaret A. ;
Crozier, Ian G. ;
Melton, Iain C. ;
Jordaens, Luc ;
Theuns, Dominic ;
Park, Robert E. ;
Wright, David J. ;
Connelly, Derek T. ;
Fynn, Simon P. ;
Murgatroyd, Francis D. ;
Sperzel, Johannes ;
Neuzner, Joerg ;
Spitzer, Stefan G. ;
Ardashev, Andrey V. ;
Oduro, Amo ;
Boersma, Lucas ;
Maass, Alexander H. ;
Van Gelder, Isabelle C. ;
Wilde, Arthur A. ;
van Dessel, Pascal F. ;
Knops, Reinoud E. ;
Barr, Craig S. ;
Lupo, Pierpaolo ;
Cappato, Riccardo ;
Grace, Andrew A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (01) :36-44
[2]   Use of an electrocardiographic screening tool to determine candidacy for a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [J].
Groh, Christopher A. ;
Sharma, Shishir ;
Pelchovitz, Daniel J. ;
Bhave, Prashant D. ;
Rhyner, John ;
Verma, Nishant ;
Arora, Rishi ;
Chicos, Alexandru B. ;
Kim, Susan S. ;
Lin, Albert C. ;
Passman, Rod S. ;
Knight, Bradley P. .
HEART RHYTHM, 2014, 11 (08) :1361-1366
[3]   Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period of > 10 years [J].
Kleemann, Thomas ;
Becker, Torsten ;
Doenges, Klaus ;
Vater, Margit ;
Senges, Jochen ;
Schneider, Steffen ;
Saggau, Werner ;
Weisse, Udo ;
Seidl, Karlheinz .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (19) :2474-2480
[4]   How many patients fulfil the surface electrocardiogram criteria for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation? [J].
Randles, Daniel A. ;
Hawkins, Nathaniel M. ;
Shaw, Matthew ;
Patwala, Ashish Y. ;
Pettit, Stephen J. ;
Wright, David J. .
EUROPACE, 2014, 16 (07) :1015-1021
[5]   The frequency and incremental cost of major complications among Medicare beneficiaries receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators [J].
Reynolds, MR ;
Cohen, DJ ;
Kugelmass, AD ;
Brown, PP ;
Becker, ER ;
Culler, SD ;
Simon, AW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (12) :2493-2497