Prediction of Implant Loss and Marginal Bone Loss by Analysis of Dental Panoramic Radiographs

被引:20
作者
Merheb, Joe [1 ]
Graham, James [2 ]
Coucke, Wim [3 ]
Roberts, Martin [2 ]
Quirynen, Marc [1 ]
Jacobs, Reinhilde [4 ]
Devlin, Hugh [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, Dept Oral Hlth Sci, Unit Periodontol, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Imaging Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Sci Inst Publ Hlth, Qual Med Labs, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Leuven, Oral Imaging Ctr, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[5] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Inst Populat Hlth, Sch Dent, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
bone density; bone loss; cancellous bone; cortical bone; dental implants; failure; mandible; OSTEOPOROSIS RISK-ASSESSMENT; COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY; DENSITY ASSESSMENTS; OSTEODENT PROJECT; MINERAL DENSITY; CORTICAL BONE; QUALITY; VALUES; SITES;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.3604
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: One of the major factors governing implant success is the quantity and density of the host bone. The aim of this work was to determine whether mandibular bone texture and cortical width measurements on plain radiographs could be associated with implant failure and/or marginal bone loss. Materials and Methods: A statistical model was built to predict implant failure; it incorporated several radiographic features of cortical and cancellous bone texture, cortical width, and patient smoking habits. Cortical width measurements and texture measurements of cortical and cancellous bone were made on the panoramic radiographs of 460 subjects. These were used to predict implant failure and marginal bone loss after 5 years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC) were used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the variables in predicting implant failure and marginal bone loss. Additionally, for 91 of 460 subjects with periapical radiographs, marginal bone levels around implants were measured over a 5-year period. Results: Of the 460 patients assessed for implant failure, 29 had failed implants (93.7% success rate). The ROC curve built from this model had a sensitivity of 62.1% and specificity of 67.5%. The AUC from the model was 0.690 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.597 to 0.783). A model was also built to predict marginal bone loss. The ROC curve had 78.6% sensitivity and 74.6% specificity (AUC = 0.880, 95% CI = 0.810 to 0.953). Mandibular cortical width was not a significant predictor of either implant failure or bone loss. Conclusion: In a retrospective analysis 5 years after implant placement, features of cancellous and cortical bone of the mandible were significant in predicting implant failure and marginal bone loss in a sample of 460 patients.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 377
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ADELL R, 1990, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V5, P347
[2]   Detecting reduced bone mineral density from dental radiographs using statistical shape models [J].
Allen, P. Danny ;
Graham, Jim ;
Farnell, Damian J. J. ;
Harrison, Elizabeth J. ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde ;
Nicopolou-Karayianni, Kety ;
Lindh, Christina ;
van der Stelt, Paul F. ;
Horner, Keith ;
Devlin, Hugh .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN BIOMEDICINE, 2007, 11 (06) :601-610
[3]   Comparative study of axial and femoral bone mineral density and parameters of mandibular bone quality in patients receiving dental implants [J].
Amorim, M. A. L. ;
Takayama, L. ;
Jorgetti, V. ;
Pereira, R. M. R. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 (10) :1494-1500
[4]  
Fuster-Torres MA, 2011, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V26, P1051
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1986, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL
[6]  
Aranyarachkul P, 2005, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V20, P416
[7]  
Bain C A, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P609
[8]   The effects of preoperative resorption and jaw anatomy on implant success. A report of 303 cases [J].
Bass, S. L. ;
Triplett, R. G. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1991, 2 (04) :193-198
[9]   Trabecular alveolar bone microarchitecture in the human mandible using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Choël, L ;
Last, D ;
Duboeuf, F ;
Seurin, MJ ;
Lissac, M ;
Briguet, A ;
Guillot, G .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 33 (03) :177-182
[10]   Automated osteoporosis risk assessment by dentists: A new pathway to diagnosis [J].
Devlin, H. ;
Allen, P. D. ;
Graham, J. ;
Jacobs, R. ;
Karayianni, K. ;
Lindh, C. ;
van der Stelt, P. F. ;
Harrison, E. ;
Adams, J. E. ;
Pavitt, S. ;
Horner, K. .
BONE, 2007, 40 (04) :835-842