Interocular Axial Length and Corneal Power Differences as Predictors of Postoperative Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery

被引:29
作者
Kansal, Vinay [1 ]
Schlenker, Matthew [2 ,3 ]
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Ophthalmol, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Prism Eye Inst, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[3] Kensington Eye Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol & Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; CALCULATION FORMULAS; EYES; METAANALYSIS; ACCURACY; BIOMETRY; MYOPIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.021
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether differences between eyes in axial length (AL) and corneal power (K) on optical biometry are predictive of refractive outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: A total of 729 patients (1458 eyes) who underwent bilateral phacoemulsification at TLC (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) from September 2013 to August 2015. Methods: We compared the proportion of patients having > 0.5 diopters (D) of refractive error from target stratified by interocular axial length differences (IALDs) and interocular K differences (IKDs) between eyes as measured by optical biometry (IOL-Master, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany). Analysis was repeated for 0.25 D or 1.0 D targets and for patients with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) > 0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) postoperatively. Main Outcome Measures: Proportions, odds ratios (ORs), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using generalized estimating equations to account for within-patient correlation. Results: Some 79.1% of eyes were <= 0.5 D of refractive target, 47.0% were <= 0.25 D, and 97.2% were <= 1.0 D. The OR of having a refractive outcome > 0.5 D from target for IALD cutoff of 0.2 mm was 1.4 (1.1-1.8), of 0.3 mm was 1.6 (1.2-2.1), and of 0.4 mm was 1.8 (1.3-2.5). This translates to 70.0% (63.5-75.7) within target for IALD of >= 0.4 mm versus 80.7%(78.4-82.9) for < 0.4 mm. For a given patient with IALD, the chance of being off target was similar for the shorter and longer eye. Eyes outside of target were twice as likely to be < -0.5 D than > 0.5 D. Interocular K difference was largely not associated with prediction error, yet larger IKD-flat, steep, and average were associated with increased odds of UCVA > 0.3 logMAR postoperatively. Conclusions: Interocular axial length difference of as little as >= 0.2 mm is associated with a higher chance of > 0.5 D of refractive error from target and worse UCVA. Interocular K difference was not associated with worse refractive error from target, although a difference of >= 0.4 D was associated with worse UCVA. These cutoffs should be considered in preoperative planning and discussion with patients. Future study is required to assess whether repeating measurements, using adjunctive measurement devices, or attempting to separate true differences from artifact based on preoperative refractive characteristics reduces residual refractive error. (C) 2018 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:972 / 981
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   CATARACT SURGICAL TECHNIQUES [J].
AGAPITOS, PJ .
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 4 (01) :39-43
[2]   The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: when should IOLMaster biometric measurements be rechecked? [J].
Cartwright, N. E. Knox ;
Johnston, R. L. ;
Jaycock, P. D. ;
Tole, D. M. ;
Sparrow, J. M. .
EYE, 2010, 24 (05) :894-900
[3]   Partial coherence interferometry: A novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery [J].
Drexler, W ;
Findl, O ;
Menapace, R ;
Rainer, G ;
Vass, C ;
Hitzenberger, CK ;
Fercher, AF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 126 (04) :524-534
[4]   Interocular axial length difference as a predictor of postoperative visual acuity after unilateral pediatric cataract extraction with primary IOL implantation [J].
Gochnauer, Ashley C. ;
Trivedi, Rupal H. ;
Hill, Elizabeth G. ;
Wilson, M. Edward .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2010, 14 (01) :20-24
[5]   Protocols for Studies of Intraocular Lens Formula Accuracy [J].
Hoffer, Kenneth J. ;
Aramberri, Jaime ;
Haigis, Wolfgang ;
Olsen, Thomas ;
Savini, Giacomo ;
Shammas, H. John ;
Bentow, Stanley .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 160 (03) :403-405
[6]   A 3-PART SYSTEM FOR REFINING INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATIONS [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
PRAGER, TC ;
CHANDLER, TY ;
MUSGROVE, KH ;
LEWIS, JW ;
RUIZ, RS .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1988, 14 (01) :17-24
[7]   Interocular axial length difference in eyes with pediatric cataracts [J].
Lal, G ;
Trivedi, RH ;
Wilson, ME ;
Scarlett, LC ;
Peterseim, MM .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2005, 9 (04) :358-362
[8]   Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review [J].
Olsen, Thomas .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 85 (05) :472-485
[9]   Efficacy and Safety of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Compared with Manual Cataract Surgery A Meta-Analysis of 14 567 Eyes [J].
Popovic, Marko ;
Campos-Moller, Xavier ;
Schlenker, Matthew B. ;
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 123 (10) :2113-2126
[10]  
Qian DW, 2016, INT J OPHTHALMOL-CHI, V9, P453, DOI 10.18240/ijo.2016.03.23