Comparing the relative mitigation potential of individual pro-environmental behaviors

被引:56
作者
Lacroix, Karine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Sch Environm Studies, David Turpin Bldg B243,POB 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
关键词
Climate change; Mitigation; Carbon footprint; Pro-environmental behavior; High-impact behavior; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CARBON EMISSIONS; PSYCHOLOGICAL-BARRIERS; US HOUSEHOLDS; ENERGY USE; CONSUMPTION; FOOD; PERCEPTIONS; REDUCTION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.068
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are modifying climate patterns on a global scale. Behavior changes at the household level can help limit the magnitude of carbon emissions and associated climate change. The objective of this study is to determine which individual actions have the largest potential for reducing household greenhouse gas emissions. Past behavior change research has focused on the reduction potential of direct emissions in one or two household domains at a time, often overlooking the indirect emissions associated with food consumption. Here, the potential greenhouse gas emissions reductions are compared for seven individual pro-environmental behaviors in the transportation, housing, and food domains. For the average household in North America and Europe, eating fewer animal products has the largest greenhouse gas emissions reduction potential of the behaviors studied, followed by switching to more fuel-efficient vehicles. Additional analyses reveal that air transportation might have larger emission reduction potential than dietary changes, especially for higher-income households that fly frequently. Targeting these high-impact behaviors will be more cost-beneficial for climate change policies and programs. This study can help guide these intervention efforts. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1398 / 1407
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Abrahamse W, 2011, HUM ECOL REV, V18, P30
[2]   The Impacts of Dietary Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use, Water Use, and Health: A Systematic Review [J].
Aleksandrowicz, Lukasz ;
Green, Rosemary ;
Joy, Edward J. M. ;
Smith, Pete ;
Haines, Andy .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11)
[3]  
[Anonymous], SUMM GUID PRINC REC
[4]   Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings [J].
Attari, Shahzeen Z. ;
DeKay, Michael L. ;
Davidson, Cliff I. ;
de Bruin, Waendi Bruine .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (37) :16054-16059
[5]   Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students' car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis [J].
Bamberg, S ;
Schmidt, P .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2003, 35 (02) :264-285
[6]   The relative greenhouse gas impacts of realistic dietary choices [J].
Berners-Lee, M. ;
Hoolohan, C. ;
Cammack, H. ;
Hewitt, C. N. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 43 :184-190
[7]  
Blake J., 1999, Local Environ, V4, P257, DOI [10.1080/13549839908725599, DOI 10.1080/13549839908725599]
[8]   How can the EU climate targets be met? A combined analysis of technological and demand-side changes in food and agriculture [J].
Bryngeisson, David ;
Wirsenius, Stefan ;
Hedenus, Fredrik ;
Sonesson, Ulf .
FOOD POLICY, 2016, 59 :152-164
[9]  
Captick S, 2014, CARBON MANAG, V5, P429
[10]   Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions [J].
Dietz, Thomas ;
Gardner, Gerald T. ;
Gilligan, Jonathan ;
Stern, Paul C. ;
Vandenbergh, Michael P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (44) :18452-18456